[kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- From: Zac White <zacw@xxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 15:21:12 -0500
I think that is a good question. I don't know much about this but I=20
have gathered that the number isn't a percent. It is hard to make a=20
percent out of the signal strength because there is really no=20
limit...you could have 200 of the current scale. It really depends on=20
distance and strength of the AP. I personally have gotten 150+. So=20
basically, it is all relative.
On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 1:09 PM, Robert B.Peirce wrote:
> I gather there is some meaning to the numbers and the differences
> between numbers, but this is not covered anywhere in the docs that I
> could see. Is it all relative or is there some absolute meaning to
> them?
> Bob Peirce Venetia, PA
> 724-941-6883
> rbpeirce@xxxxxxxxxxxx [HOME (Mac)]
> rbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [OFFICE]
>
> There is=A0 only one basic human=A0 right, the=A0 right to do as you =
damn=20
> well
> please.=A0 And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to =
take
> the consequences.=A0 -- P.J. O'Rourke
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- From: Robert B . Peirce
- References:
- [kismac] What does signal strength mean?
- From: Robert B . Peirce
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] What does signal strength mean?
- » [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- » [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- » [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- » [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- » [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- [kismac] Re: What does signal strength mean?
- From: Robert B . Peirce
- [kismac] What does signal strength mean?
- From: Robert B . Peirce