[kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: Robin L Darroch <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:56:00 +0800
Or another possibility - not quite sure how to do this - would be to
let KisMAC auto-range: scale everything to 0-100 based on the
strongest signal received by that device so far. Of course, it would
need to remember that along with the individual driver entry in the
preferences, and maybe allow a manual override? Essentially, start
off with a mapping of 0-10 -> 0-100 (i.e. multiplier [m] = 10).
Now, if raw signal strength (reported by device) = r, and scaled
strength = s,the algorithm goes like this:
s = mr
if (s>100) {
s = 100
m = 100/r
rescale_previous_data()
}
initially there would be lots of calls to the rescale function, but
once it encountered one really strong signal, everything after that
would result in s<=100, so existing data wouldn't need to be
rescaled. That won't be very processor intensive, because even if we
assume it happens 50 times before it finds a maximum that isn't
beaten, we're still only talking about a simple multiplication. That
way you know that 100 is the strongest that device has ever seen, and
a 50 on an Airport Extreme is about the same as a 50 on a DWL-122.
At the end of each scan, store "m" along with the record of that
particular driver.
Thoughts? Anyone want to implement it? :)
Maybe an easier approach would be to allow the user to put in scale
values themselves in the preferences for the driver? That way you
wouldn't need to know about every card that comes a long. A user
could infer what the scale is by having it shut off, then apply a
mathematical factor after they say "my max is 40" or "my max is 125"
?
On 2/27/06, Robin L Darroch
<<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To do that we'd have to develop a database of comparative strengths -
which would be pretty rough at best... but perhaps that's worth
doing? I can tabulate Airport Extreme active vs. DWL-122 and Airport
Extreme passive vs. DWL-122... but only if the consensus is that it's
worth doing.
Or, if Kismac would "scale" it so it was consistent across adapters?
On 2/27/06, Geoffrey Kruse
<<mailto:<mailto:gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I think this may be dependent on the driver. For example, my usb
card seems to have a range of 0 to 40 while my airport extreme seems
to have a range of 0 to 100. It would be nice if we used something
more standard like dbm.
Geoff
On Feb 27, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Mike Williams wrote:
Hi,
in KisMAC and other WiFi apps there is the "Signal"-strength-
number. From which number to which number does this go?
The highest number I've seen was 101. Most networks are about 61
and some are 31 or so.
What is the smallest and the highest number that could appear?
Regards
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robin L. Darroch - PO Box 2715, South Hedland WA 6722 - +61 421 503 966
<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -
<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxx -
<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Digital things
worthwhile: <http://www.digg.com>http://www.digg.com,
<http://del.icio.us>http://del.icio.us,
<http://www.boingboing.net>http://www.boingboing.net, iTunes, Skype,
Bluetooth Headset
Enjoy the documented stupidity at
<http://beatdown.blogspot.com>http://beatdown.blogspot.com
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robin L. Darroch - PO Box 2715, South Hedland WA 6722 - +61 421 503 966
robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - robin@xxxxxxxxxxx - robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [kismac] Signal strength
- From: Mike Williams
- [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: Geoffrey Kruse
- [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: m0bilitee
- [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: m0bilitee
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- » [kismac] Re: Signal strength
On 2/27/06, Robin L Darroch <<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To do that we'd have to develop a database of comparative strengths - which would be pretty rough at best... but perhaps that's worth doing? I can tabulate Airport Extreme active vs. DWL-122 and Airport Extreme passive vs. DWL-122... but only if the consensus is that it's worth doing.
Or, if Kismac would "scale" it so it was consistent across adapters?
On 2/27/06, Geoffrey Kruse
<<mailto:<mailto:gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think this may be dependent on the driver. For example, my usb card seems to have a range of 0 to 40 while my airport extreme seems to have a range of 0 to 100. It would be nice if we used something more standard like dbm.
Geoff On Feb 27, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Mike Williams wrote:
Hi, in KisMAC and other WiFi apps there is the "Signal"-strength- number. From which number to which number does this go? The highest number I've seen was 101. Most networks are about 61 and some are 31 or so. What is the smallest and the highest number that could appear?
Regards
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robin L. Darroch - PO Box 2715, South Hedland WA 6722 - +61 421 503 966
<mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - <mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxx - <mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Digital things worthwhile: <http://www.digg.com>http://www.digg.com, <http://del.icio.us>http://del.icio.us, <http://www.boingboing.net>http://www.boingboing.net, iTunes, Skype, Bluetooth Headset
Enjoy the documented stupidity at <http://beatdown.blogspot.com>http://beatdown.blogspot.com
- [kismac] Signal strength
- From: Mike Williams
- [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: Geoffrey Kruse
- [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: m0bilitee
- [kismac] Re: Signal strength
- From: m0bilitee