[kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- From: Court Kizer <kizer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:13:53 -0700
I'll pay $150 for any device that works with my macbook pro, and lets
me use ALL the features like auth flood, packet flood. Anyone? Thanks.
-Court
On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Ronald Van Assche wrote:
Le 13 août 06 à 01:45, Rohan Hill a écrit :
Is DWL-122 different from DWL-G122 ? Is that what I’m missing here?
Yes,
DWL-122 == prism2 chipset , very usefull as a primary device in
Kismac ( not tested by me)
DWL-G122 = ralink chipset , not usable in Kismac, even as a simple
device.
have a look at : <http://kismac.de/_trac/wiki/FAQ>
Dlink DWL-G122 usb
Not working yet - it's a ralink chipset. There are linux drivers
out there for it, and these might work with it. However, we do not
know if this even supports rfmon mode? Some chipsets don't..
the full list of supported hardware is there :
<http://kismac.de/_trac/wiki/Hardware%20List>
and developers experiences here :
<http://kismac.de/_trac/wiki/Our%20Hardware>
- References:
- [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- From: Rohan Hill
- [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- From: Ronald Van Assche
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- » [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Ronald Van Assche wrote:
Le 13 août 06 à 01:45, Rohan Hill a écrit :
Is DWL-122 different from DWL-G122 ? Is that what I’m missing here?
Yes,
DWL-122 == prism2 chipset , very usefull as a primary device in Kismac ( not tested by me)
DWL-G122 = ralink chipset , not usable in Kismac, even as a simple device.
have a look at : <http://kismac.de/_trac/wiki/FAQ>
Dlink DWL-G122 usb
Not working yet - it's a ralink chipset. There are linux drivers out there for it, and these might work with it. However, we do not know if this even supports rfmon mode? Some chipsets don't..
the full list of supported hardware is there : <http://kismac.de/_trac/wiki/Hardware%20List> and developers experiences here : <http://kismac.de/_trac/wiki/Our%20Hardware>
- [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- From: Rohan Hill
- [kismac] Re: Kismac captures 1,000,000+ packets, but none are DATA or IVs ?
- From: Ronald Van Assche