[kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Derrick J Brashear <shadow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:37:08 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Michael Rossberg wrote:
> > Overall, this is a significant improvement over 0.05e. Once we
> > can get the beachball problems solved, I'd happy to move forward with
> > using this as my starting point for the wireless signal strength
> > article I had previously mentioned.
>
> Looks like a deadlock... I ll be out hunting....
Something I observed in 0.5e, forgot, and can't try right now: while
scanning, click the top of the "last seen" column, to sort by that. very
shortly, permanent beachball. i meant to see what was going on, and then
forgot about it.
- References:
- [kismac] KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Michael Rossberg
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Michael Rossberg
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- [kismac] KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Michael Rossberg
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05f
- From: Michael Rossberg