[kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: ard.jonker@xxxxxxxxx
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:58:44 +0200
At 2:24 +0200 03/09/16, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Median is easier than mean (average) and standard deviation. For
>median, you just keep a sorted list of the measured values, and you
>take the middle number (for odd numbers of samples). So, if you had
>99 measurements, the median would be the value stored at element #50,
>because 99+1/2=50.0. For even numbers of samples, you average the
>two middle samples (100+1/2=50.5, so average the values at #50 and
>#51).
Brad, does that mean that you have a variable number of elements in
your list? In that case, maybe the modal number would be more handy.
You keep a static array in which you tally the signal strength (that
is, if you measure a signal strength of n, you increase element n by
1).
Taken the signal strength can vary between 0 and 100% (for any given
constellation on your computer), you take an array of 100 buckets.
The number of the bucket with the highest content is taken as the
modal value. I guess you could call this 'histogram maximum' too. No
statistics and no dynamic memory allocation involved ;-)
ard
- Follow-Ups:
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Brad Knowles
- References:
- [kismac] KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Michael Rossberg
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Michael Rossberg
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Brad Knowles
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Michael Rossberg
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Michael Rossberg
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05e
- From: Brad Knowles