[kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:42:22 +0200
At 10:13 AM -0500 2003/06/06, Lee Lindquist wrote:
> What is so special about the cisco cards? Is it worth replacing my
> dual MMCX 200mw Sanyo card?
The cisco cards are some of the most powerful (and highly
sensitive) cards on the market. When looking at cards, don't just
look at their transmit power, also look at their receive sensitivity
-- Transmit power only covers you getting your packets to the
network, while your ability to receive packets is covered by receive
sensitivity.
It is entirely possible that the cisco card may be lower power
than yours, but have higher receive sensitivity. Even if that's not
the case, there are damn few cards available that have the power and
sensitivity equal to the cisco cards -- perhaps yours is one of the
very few others.
Keep in mind that cisco may have started with a standard chipset,
but I know that they have done a hell of a lot of work in the
hardware and firmware to bring it up to their specs. Their cards
really are the most robust and absolute best available in the market,
at least for people who can afford to pay that kind of price.
Also take into account the amount of power drawn from the system
to operate the card, and whether or not the card has the ability to
step down in power (to save battery life). I believe that the cisco
cards can do this (and typically do it by default), whereas yours may
or may not.
Finally, also keep in mind the interface -- some cards are 16-bit
PCMCIA standard (5V only), while others are 32-bit CardBus (5V and/or
3.3v). Older computers can only deal with 16-bit PCMCIA cards, not
32-bit CardBus cards.
At the very least, I'd encourage you to look closely at the specs
on the cisco card, and consider whether or not it would be an
improvement for you.
Even if your card is superior in every possible way to the cisco,
there is still an advantage to having support for a broader variety
of cards -- especially including cisco, since they have worked to
make commercial drivers available for the broadest variety of
hardware platforms and OSes (more so than any other manufacturer),
which means that you're likely to find them widely distributed and in
some very unexpected places.
It's nice to be able to provide a solution to people who have
cards like this.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
- References:
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- From: Lee Lindquist
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] KisMAC 0.05a
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- » [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- [kismac] Re: KisMAC 0.05a
- From: Lee Lindquist