[kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 14:27:33 +0100
At 12:21 PM +1030 2003/11/22, Ryan Verner wrote:
> Howdy, for stumbling using kismac (say, wardriving), what are the cards
> like? I'm currently happy with my Orinico (30mW?) + Kismet; I'm not
> sure what the drivers do, but damn - kismac picks up at least twice as
> many AP's anything else, even kismet; possibly even more.
I haven't done much war-driving, certainly not since KisMac came
into existence or the Senao cards became available. I can say that
the Senao cards allow me to get good connectivity to my WLAN from the
top floor of the house (three floors above where the AirPort base
stations are installed), whereas the built-in AirPort card craps out
anywhere beyond one floor above.
My Lucent/Orinoco WaveLAN Gold seems to be okay two floors above,
but sometimes that's a bit flaky. The Cisco AiroNet 350 card is
solid two floors above and sometimes works okay three floors above.
I still hope to write an article on measuring and monitoring
real-world WiFi card performance in full three-dimensional space (all
other articles I've seen have talked only about measuring
two-dimensional performance), so maybe this will all become a bit
more clear.
Anyway, keep in mind that this is an old house from the early
1900's with 14' ceilings and heavy construction.
> I find I can pickup AP's inside of buildings (SOHO access points) from
> around 100M away; for example, on the opposite side of the road,
> approaching the building. Any better with these 100mW cards?
My experience is that they Senao cards are much better than the
Lucent/Orinoco cards, both in terms of having their signal heard by
the base station (power), and in terms of picking up weak base
station signals from far away (sensitivity).
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
- References:
- [kismac] High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Java Nut
- [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Ryan Verner
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- » [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- [kismac] High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Java Nut
- [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Brad Knowles
- [kismac] Re: High Output Cards that work with Kismac?
- From: Ryan Verner