Thanks for the confirmation!
I thought thats what the different messages meant, but it's good to have
someone else clear it up!
By flashing, I mean upgrading the firmware to the latest version. I wasn't
sure if this would make any difference anyway.
Dom
On 10/04/07, Jake Trimble <monkeys.steal.my.boxers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yeah. I have one, and have had it work. If it's really stuck, let it
> soak up some iv's, and then try injection. Not to sound too know-it-allish
> (sorry if you already know this...), but when it says waiting for
> interesting packets, it means that it hasn't collected any packets that it
> can successfully re-inject. When it is testing them, it is seeing if they
> will work for re-injection. Once that little window goes away, then the
> iv's should start jumping up 10 at a time or so, depending on how close the
> signal is. Sorry if you already knew that, or if it's incorrect, but thats
> my understanding. Also, what exactly do you mean by "flashing one?" Thanks
>
> -jake
>
> On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Dom wrote:
>
> Fair enough, it was only an idea. Thanks anyway!
>
> Anyone else got any ideas? Can anyone confirm it works?
>
> Dom
>
> On 09/04/07, Jesse Stanford < safetechs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I believe I did flash one on a windows pc at one point, and it didn't
> > seem to make much of a difference. On the other hand, the network I tried
> > it with I believe was a 11g network and I didn't give it much time to sit
> > around. Jesse
> > On Apr 9, 2007, at 4:56 AM, Dom wrote:
> >
> > Hey Jesse,
> >
> > As you have two, could you try flashing one to the latest firmware?
> > I'd be happy to do it for you if you're not too sure., my hope is it will
> > make the thing work better! :(
> >
> > Dom
> >
> > On 09/04/07, Jesse Stanford < safetechs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > I have two of these lying around that I'd be happy to ship off free
> > > to Kismac developers (or anyone) if they could use them) Jesse
> > > On Apr 8, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Dom wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey KisMac list,
> > >
> > > I'm new to the whole mailing list thing, but I'm hoping you guys can
> > > provide a helpful introduction!
> > >
> > > I have recently purchased a Ashton Digital WRUB-2011i (Model WM168b)
> > > USB dongle and it works fine as a passive scanner, listing lots of WIFI
> > > networks, their clients, and so on. However, when I try to perform an
> > > authentication flood, or a de-authentication attack, nothing seems to
> > > happen. When I try to re-inject packets, the loading bar comes up and says
> > > "Waiting for interesting packets", and then eventually changes to "Testing
> > > injection packets" (or something similar) but never actually seems to have
> > > any affect on the IV count.
> > >
> > > I've set it as the primary injection device, and also selected the
> > > correct channel for injection. Any ideas? I'd love to get this setup
> > > working!
> > >
> > > Dom
> > >
> > > --
> > > "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
> > > potatoes" -- Douglas Adams
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------
> > > Jesse Stanford
> > > http://safetacks.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
> > potatoes" -- Douglas Adams
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > Jesse Stanford
> > http://safetacks.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
> potatoes" -- Douglas Adams
>
>
>
>
--
"It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with
potatoes" -- Douglas Adams
