[kismac] Re: Aircrack

  • From: "John Warren" <xaive1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 13:28:40 -0700

Well I'm scanning a network right now and I just collected packets
instead of trying the frag attack.  I've got 10074 IV's as of right
now, so the network is giving off IV's.  I'm wondering if something
isn't working with my injection.

On 7/27/07, Steven Walt <stevenwalt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Basically, it uses a different attack - ptw attack. It is much more
> efficient (it needs way less ivs). For example, I have cracked 64bit with
> 15,000 ivs and 128bit with 65,000 ivs. I don't know about capturing with
> kismac and using aircrack though. What I do (it works VERY well):
>
> Instead of using Kismac (which only works on b networks), on my macbook I
> have vmware fusion. You can download a special pre-made vm full of the
> aircrack suite. I bought a WUSB54GC and installed it's driver... it works
> very well in vmware and I can even use the fragmentation attack (when
> there's no clients). BTW this setup works for b and g networks... My video
> for this:
>
> Fragmentation attack with airoscript [low quality BUT explained (youtube) ]
>  Fragmentation attack with airoscript [ high quality AND explanation (stage
> 6)] – best bet
>  Fragmentation attack with airoscript [ super high quality BUT NO
> explanation (stage 6)]
>
>
> Any questions - stevenwalt@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> On 7/27/07, I. R. C. <ma111v1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks Easy B,
> >
> > Kismac is great, but for 104 bit cracking Kismac takes forever - and
> > according to this
> >
> http://www.security-hacks.com/2007/04/27/aircrack-ptw-wep-cracking-tool
> -
> > aircrack does it fast. Why the difference?
> >
> >
> > >From: Easy B <easy-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >Subject: [kismac] Re: Aircrack
> > >Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:11:04 +0200
> > >
> > >Hi
> > >
> > >Aircrack compiles fine on Mac OS X. There's a Makefile included that
> only
> > >builds the working apps (use -f option for make).
> > >As far as I know Kismac already uses airkrack for cracking though.
> > >
> > >Cheers,
> > >Ezra.
> > >
> > >On 27.07.2007, at 12:40, I. R. C. wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hello,
> > >>
> > >>I want to use Aircrack on Kismac data. Is there a Mac version of
> > >>Aircrack? How do I do it?
> > >>
> > >>Thanks
> > >>
> >
> >>_________________________________________________________________
> > >>http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-
> > >>us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> >
> http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=hmtextlinkjuly07
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Other related posts: