[kismac] Re: 1.0

  • From: Zac White <zacw@xxxxxxx>
  • To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:32:20 -0500

I agree. Why not have this functionality as an option? You could keep 
the wonderful GPS support right? And the graphs (probably just signal). 
And the familiar interface. Oh, and could you have applescript support 
so that when a new network is discovered, it would run an applescript 
of your choice. I can see this only being useful in the Apple Driver 
case because I would have it send an email or something. So you could 
be driving down a city street and be sending emails :). Anyway, it 
can't hurt...

On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 7:19 AM, Brad Knowles wrote:

> At 3:03 AM +0200 2003/09/27, Michael Rossberg wrote:
>
>>>  I understand that using the Apple API would necessitate use of a
>>>  Probe request, which I can live with, but if it got me the other
>>>  functionality of Kismac, I would be VERY happy.
>>
>>  it is so limited that you cannot do anything more than macstumbler 
>> does.
>
>       IMO, that would still be a big improvement.  This way we would
> need only one program to do everything that can be done, and we could
> dump MacStumbler, iStumbler, and all those other programs.
>
> -- 
> Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
>      -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
>
> GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) 
> W+++(--) N+
> !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) 
> R+(+++)
> tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* 
> z(+++)
>


Other related posts: