[kag] Re: third to find

  • From: Graeme Watson <Graeme.Watson@xxxxxx>
  • To: kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:02:31 -0400

I thought 38 was great until we fell over the cliff.  OK, we climbed 
down, and it was my old GPSr fault not the cache.
Gord, no you were right the first time, you are nuts, lol.
Cheers
Remote Sensor
Gordon Campbell wrote:

>I've been rather pleasantly surprised with everyone's reactions to Lord
>Simcoe's cache. I guess we're not all that nuts for loving it over there
>after all. :-)
>
>FWIW, I thought 38 is Great was a cool spot, too.
>
>Cheers,
>.....G
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: kag-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kag-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of Hoover
>Sent: June 20, 2004 4:50 PM
>To: kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [kag] third to find
>
>You know that feeling you get when you check your email and see a message
>with the subject "Owner: somebody has found your cache?" Wow. What a let
>down this one was.
>
>  
>
>>Log Date: 6/20/2004
>>Well - almost found it.  We got to the cliff, too much for a 5 year old
>>to climb, but we felt it was close enough.
>>    
>>
>
>
>And look what he said about 38 is Great:
>
>  
>
>>Log Date: 6/20/2004
>>38 is not so great.  A bit boring.  Nothing of real interest.
>>    
>>
>
>We thought 38 is Great was really pretty, and we even saw a rainbow and a
>porcupine. He must not have looked around very much.
>
>Bah,
>Hoover
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag
>
>  
>



------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag

Other related posts: