[kag] Re: third to find

  • From: "Gordon Campbell" <gordon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:31:13 -0400

I've been rather pleasantly surprised with everyone's reactions to Lord
Simcoe's cache. I guess we're not all that nuts for loving it over there
after all. :-)

FWIW, I thought 38 is Great was a cool spot, too.

Cheers,
.....G

-----Original Message-----
From: kag-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kag-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Hoover
Sent: June 20, 2004 4:50 PM
To: kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [kag] third to find

You know that feeling you get when you check your email and see a message
with the subject "Owner: somebody has found your cache?" Wow. What a let
down this one was.

> Log Date: 6/20/2004
> Well - almost found it.  We got to the cliff, too much for a 5 year old
> to climb, but we felt it was close enough.


And look what he said about 38 is Great:

> Log Date: 6/20/2004
> 38 is not so great.  A bit boring.  Nothing of real interest.

We thought 38 is Great was really pretty, and we even saw a rainbow and a
porcupine. He must not have looked around very much.

Bah,
Hoover

------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag


------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag

Other related posts: