[kag] Re: Now that is a cache

  • From: "Steve Koopman" <skoopman1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:29:25 -0500

Heck, bring on the lawsuits.  They can't take what I don't have!    :-)

Koopy

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lloyd Baker" <binrat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:23 PM
Subject: [kag] Re: Now that is a cache


> Innocent until proven guilty, he is a "alleged suspect" until he is tried 
> in
> a court of law, police don't like lawsuits.
>
> That is my take, Koopy can confirm if I am wrong or not.
>
> Binrat
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Hoover" <mlehotay@xxxxxxx>
> To: <kag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 8:08 PM
> Subject: [kag] Re: Now that is a cache
>
>
>> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Lloyd Baker wrote:
>>
>> > This is the kind of cache I would like to find, hope everything works
>> > out for the kids.
>> >  http://tinyurl.com/6rcdr
>>
>> The last line of the article has me puzzled. What does the term "alleged
>> suspect" mean? Is it somebody who is suspected of being a suspect? Or is
>> it somebody who is suspected of committing a suspected crime? Koopy?
>>
>> -Hoover
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag
> 



------------------------------------------------------------
Kingston Area Geocachers mailing list
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/kag

Other related posts: