[JYO] ...Latest from Operation Raincheck
- From: FlyboyEd@xxxxxxx
- To: jyo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 07:16:26 EDT
I'm forwarding the excellent email below with the permission of its
author, Mike Sapp of the TSS Flying Club. He attended the Operation
Raincheck session on Saturday and has very interesting news and perspective to
share.
The meeting he refers to, by the way, is our monthly meeting of the
TSS Flying Club - _http://www.tss.http_ (http://www.tss.org/) - six Cessnas
based at of GAI.
-Bart
_bepstein@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:bepstein@xxxxxxxxx)
------------------------------
TSSers-
This is a long e-mail which is a de-brief on my session today at
Potomac Tracon as part of Operation Raincheck. If you are interested in the
future of the ADIZ and our airport you will want to read on. Unfortunately,
the news is a mixed bag - and not very good for us at GAI at all.
If you haven't made it out to this session yet you really should. It
is well worth the half day of time. Now on to the details:
At today's session, the FAA management was allowed to share details and even
a copy of the draft plan to replace the ADIZ. This is
ostensibly the result of all the feedback we gave during the NPRM
period some months back. The controllers told us right up front that
even though they and the FAA management lobbied hard for a solution that
made sense, the security folks calling the shots really don't care. At first,
FAA Management and rank and file thought that
perhaps the problem was that the people driving the changes just
didn't understand the complexity of the air traffic control. Now
after many months of meetings and discussions it is apparent that
they do indeed understand, but they just don't care. Sad.
They also told us about 100 times that this plan, although targeted
for implementation in July, has been modified many times in the past
couple of weeks and we really shouldn't take any of this as written
in stone yet.
Anyway, here's the basics of what our wonderful government has come up with:
1) The new plan will be a permanent fixture - not a temporary one
like the ADIZ. The new airspace will not be called an ADIZ -
although the precise name of what they will call it is somewhat up in
the air.
2) The FRZ is basically left the way it is, although they are
planning to take a small slice off the top near the BWI VFR corridor
to make that corridor a bit wider and easier to navigate. Dave
Wartofsky is still screwed. He was there today and was very
interesting to hear by the way.
3) The new ADIZ (which isn't an ADIZ anymore) will basically be a
30NM circle from the DCA vortac. All the parts up around BAL and IAD will be
gone. This is good news for a variety of satellite airports
like Bay Bridge and MTN which won't have to deal with this stuff
anymore.
4) They are going to cut notches in the 30NM circle for certain
outlying airports like Manassas, Quantico, and Leesburg. These
airports will be given a *very* narrow VFR corridor to get in and out
without a clearance. I think the current procedures have those
aircraft squawking a specific code that's it - kind of like some of
the boundary airports do now. (more on this in a minute)
5) Ok, here's the bad news. GAI is just plain screwed. We don't get
any special notches or anything. We are right in the heart of this
new airspace and even with pleadings from ATC, the security people would not
cut any notches for us - we were just too close to DC.
So, this doesn't sound so bad....except for number 6! Read on....
6) The new airspace will require complete positive control of all
aircraft operating within it. This means that the existing
requirements to File, Squawk, and Talk, will be done away with and
replaced with a much more onerous requirement. We will now have to obtain a
clearance to enter (exactly like class B)
At first glance that doesn't sound so bad - that's basically the way
we operate now except that the phraseology will now include "cleared into
the XXX" But here's the problem. According to ATC, the new rules require for
them to maintain the kind of control that can only be accomplished if you are
talking to the controller who is working the sector whose airspace you occupy.
This means that all VFR departures would have to talk to the same controller
who is working IFR departures. They would be unable to continue with the
126.75 frequency - since that controller doesn't actually "control" any
airspace at all. They explained that the whole reason they created
that frequency was to avoid the massive delays that were happening
during peak hours before they set it up. VFR departures would be
held on the ground at GAI just like IFR departures. The same would
happen with arrivals. If you think it's bad waiting for a squawk on
126.75 on a busy weekend, just try getting a clearance into the
airspace during rush hour at BWI. The controllers at Potomac are
convinced this is going to be disastrous.
There are dozens of issues that the controllers say haven't been
worked out yet. For one, they don't understand what services they
will be required to provide you as VFR since they will be forced by
this reg to give you "radar contact." They don't know for example
what the lost com procedures will be or what separation they will be
required to give.
The controllers also said they have grave concerns about the funnel
airspace created at these notches for JYO and the like. All the VFR
arrivals and departures will be sharing a very small slice of
airspace and right now the FAA is not planning on charting the
procedures. The Potomac Tracon people are pleading with the charting people
to make VFR flyway charts like days of old for these
corridors.
There were a number of other things discussed which could be of
interest to members that I observed:
1) If you are interested in the Dulles East Downwind you cannot know if you
are going to get it until you are right there. The
controllers will make a snap decision on the spot if they can
accommodate you. They have actually been getting in trouble with
management for giving it out to GA when there are too many arrivals
in the vicinity. They know that the alternative sucks, but if they
can give it to you they will.
2) If you want to check for flight planning, you can check the FAA
web site at _http://www.fly.http://www.fly.http://www.http_
(http://www.fly.faa.gov/Products/AADC/aadc.html) and they have a real-time
graph of arrival
loads at all major airports. You
can plug in IAD and get an hour by hour forecast of arrival loads
into the airport. If you see that graph spike you know you won't be
getting the transition at that time.
3) Many times people who are waiting for ADIZ clearances fly towards the
ADIZ and then when they get close they turn at right angles and fly along the
ADIZ boundary. At this point they are flying an arc which is almost coincident
with the radar sweep. When you do that in many cases you become invisible to
the radar - even the primary.They suggest a 45 degree turn to avoid flying in
tandem with the radar antenna.
4) When you file IFR flight plans, don't just file direct to a far
off place. File your first one (or even better two) fixes in the
Potomac airspace so that they know which direction you're intending
to go. Apparently, they get lots of flight plans with lat longs in
them which just causes them to have to do all your flight planning
for you. NOTE: Even filing EMI direct is not good enough since
they won't know which direction you are planning to go after EMI.
File EMI MRB for the west or EMI BAL for the south or east. At least
that way they know where you are trying to go.
5) Never trust your GPS to show you clear of the ADIZ. They
apparently have to bust a significant number of people who seem to
make a game of how quickly they can squawk 1200 after leaving the
ADIZ. They don't care how long you keep that code after departing
the ADIZ. Be safe and keep it in the box for a bunch of miles before
going 1200.
6) You can never really know when 126.75 will be active. They
suggest that you just call the normal sector controller first and he
or she will tell you to call 126.75 (while it still exists anyway).
They acknowledged that sometimes you can get a gruff sounding
response to this, but they assured us that this is the correct
procedure and they really aren't upset with you for that.
Interesting tidbits were learned as well. I didn't realize that
although they are indeed all in the same room at Potomac, the
controllers do not get qualified in different areas. The Dulles
controllers do not switch and do Baltimore and vice versa. They
qualify in a specific area and stay only in that area. There are
over 350 altitudes that must be memorized to work the Mt. Vernon
(DCA) area alone.
That's quite a lot, but I'll be at the meeting on Monday to discuss
if desired.
-Mike
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Other related posts:
- » [JYO] ...Latest from Operation Raincheck