[JYO] Fwd: Navy/Marines Propose New Military Operating Areas (MOAs) in already-satu...
- From: FlyboyEd@xxxxxxx
- To: jyo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:12:02 EDT
--- Begin Message ---
- From: "Hudson, Chris" <Chris.Hudson@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Taylor,Keith" <av8ndds@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:25:18 -0400
Hello to Aviation Supporters regionwide:
I write today to advise of the pending proposal by the Navy to establish
new MOA airspace in Eastern NC, a part of our state which already has a
disproportionate share of Special Use Airspace (SUA) in the region. SUA
is an important part of our national defense aviation programs and it is
of course necessary that some airspace be set aside for high-performance
and other aircraft to practice what they do in combat and in the process
of supplying and supporting our troops. At the same time, some regions
and states have traditionally carried more than their own weight in the
allocation of SUA. Eastern NC happens to be among those regions. There
is, thankfully, an appropriate process providing the average citizen
and/or aviator the opportunity to comment on the effects and viability
of new proposed SUA prior to its implementation and use.
The proposed Gunny and Core MOAs are to be established across and North
of the Pamlico River and along the Core Banks between Cape Lookout and
Ocracoke I. In my opinion, it warrants your concern. If you foresee
this proposed airspace affecting you or your flight operations in the
region, please comment to FAA at:
Federal Aviation Administration
Mr.Mark Ward
Manager, Operations Branch ASO-530.8
PO Box 20636
Atlanta, GA 30320
You should refer to North Carolina MOA Proposal NC-04-ASO-006-NR.
The formal comment period ran September 30, but FAA's Southern Region
has assured us that they will be accepting them "as long as there are
comments coming in". If you would like more data on the proposal, our
material is at www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2004/041012nc.html
<http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2004/041012nc.html> . Also
please note the attached copy of AOPA's comments on this proposal.
AOPA's concerns fall in several areas:
1) FAA failed to notify AOPA and pilots of this proposal via Fed
Register publication or mail. AOPA and other alphabet groups got word
of the plan only through users who provided feedback as to their
concerns.
2) Radically increasing the SUA above 3000' as proposed would compress
civil traffic into the airspace (below 3000') in which 98.4% of known
aircraft birdstrikes occur;
2) The Core MOA as drawn would require extended operations below 3000'
IF the pilot wished to avoid the airspace while simultaneously
maintaining 2000' or greater as recommended over the Cape Lookout
National Seashore, compressing much of the N/S Outer Banks traffic into
a 1000' stratum;
3) The Gunny MOA (formerly called "Mattamuskeet") would create similar
compression, overlying significant national wildlife area acreage and
forcing traffic avoiding the SUA floor at 3000' into the narrow band
between 2000' and 3000'. It would further cause pilots to fly overwater
for extended periods to operate east- or westbound under that 3000'
floor.
4) Radar coverage for flights in this region below 4000' has been
abysmal for years, and Navy and Air Force management have known this; it
is into that airspace stratum that traffic seeking to avoid the airspace
would be funneled, increasing the chances of traffic conflicts and
collisions. If such new airspace WERE implemented, the using entities
should be required to fund the cost of new radar equipment and the
ongoing ATC and maintenance staffing needed to operate it.
5) The economic and cumulative impact of the new airspace would add
unnecessary burden to a region which has accepted more than its share of
SUA over many years. Multiple airports and their communities would
experience a drop in GA transient traffic and the corollary negative
financial impact as more pilots made the conscious decision to bypass
the military-use airspace.
If there are questions on the issue, please advise by email and I will
be happy to try and answer or point you to someone better able to do so.
With thanks for your strong support for general aviation in this region
and kindest regards,
Chris Hudson
Mid-Atlantic Regional Representative
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association
PO Box 33877
Charlotte, NC 28233-3877
(704)338-9161
Fax 376-0455
chris.hudson@xxxxxxxx <mailto:chris.hudson@xxxxxxxx>
--- End Message ---
Other related posts:
- » [JYO] Fwd: Navy/Marines Propose New Military Operating Areas (MOAs) in already-satu...
- From: "Hudson, Chris" <Chris.Hudson@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "Taylor,Keith" <av8ndds@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:25:18 -0400
Hello to Aviation Supporters regionwide: I write today to advise of the pending proposal by the Navy to establish new MOA airspace in Eastern NC, a part of our state which already has a disproportionate share of Special Use Airspace (SUA) in the region. SUA is an important part of our national defense aviation programs and it is of course necessary that some airspace be set aside for high-performance and other aircraft to practice what they do in combat and in the process of supplying and supporting our troops. At the same time, some regions and states have traditionally carried more than their own weight in the allocation of SUA. Eastern NC happens to be among those regions. There is, thankfully, an appropriate process providing the average citizen and/or aviator the opportunity to comment on the effects and viability of new proposed SUA prior to its implementation and use. The proposed Gunny and Core MOAs are to be established across and North of the Pamlico River and along the Core Banks between Cape Lookout and Ocracoke I. In my opinion, it warrants your concern. If you foresee this proposed airspace affecting you or your flight operations in the region, please comment to FAA at: Federal Aviation Administration Mr.Mark Ward Manager, Operations Branch ASO-530.8 PO Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 You should refer to North Carolina MOA Proposal NC-04-ASO-006-NR. The formal comment period ran September 30, but FAA's Southern Region has assured us that they will be accepting them "as long as there are comments coming in". If you would like more data on the proposal, our material is at www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2004/041012nc.html <http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsitems/2004/041012nc.html> . Also please note the attached copy of AOPA's comments on this proposal. AOPA's concerns fall in several areas: 1) FAA failed to notify AOPA and pilots of this proposal via Fed Register publication or mail. AOPA and other alphabet groups got word of the plan only through users who provided feedback as to their concerns. 2) Radically increasing the SUA above 3000' as proposed would compress civil traffic into the airspace (below 3000') in which 98.4% of known aircraft birdstrikes occur; 2) The Core MOA as drawn would require extended operations below 3000' IF the pilot wished to avoid the airspace while simultaneously maintaining 2000' or greater as recommended over the Cape Lookout National Seashore, compressing much of the N/S Outer Banks traffic into a 1000' stratum; 3) The Gunny MOA (formerly called "Mattamuskeet") would create similar compression, overlying significant national wildlife area acreage and forcing traffic avoiding the SUA floor at 3000' into the narrow band between 2000' and 3000'. It would further cause pilots to fly overwater for extended periods to operate east- or westbound under that 3000' floor. 4) Radar coverage for flights in this region below 4000' has been abysmal for years, and Navy and Air Force management have known this; it is into that airspace stratum that traffic seeking to avoid the airspace would be funneled, increasing the chances of traffic conflicts and collisions. If such new airspace WERE implemented, the using entities should be required to fund the cost of new radar equipment and the ongoing ATC and maintenance staffing needed to operate it. 5) The economic and cumulative impact of the new airspace would add unnecessary burden to a region which has accepted more than its share of SUA over many years. Multiple airports and their communities would experience a drop in GA transient traffic and the corollary negative financial impact as more pilots made the conscious decision to bypass the military-use airspace. If there are questions on the issue, please advise by email and I will be happy to try and answer or point you to someone better able to do so. With thanks for your strong support for general aviation in this region and kindest regards, Chris Hudson Mid-Atlantic Regional Representative Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association PO Box 33877 Charlotte, NC 28233-3877 (704)338-9161 Fax 376-0455 chris.hudson@xxxxxxxx <mailto:chris.hudson@xxxxxxxx>
--- End Message ---