[JYO] Airhead Approach to Safe Skies
- From: FlyboyEd@xxxxxxx
- To: jyo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:00:28 EDT
_http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6933-2004Jun25.html_
(http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6933-2004Jun25.html)
Airhead Approach to Safe Skies
Sunday, June 27, 2004; Page B08
<NITF>The June 9 snafu involving the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) that resulted in a
needless evacuation of the Capitol was just another visit from an existing,
known
problem ["Capitol Plane Scare Blamed on Lack of Communication; TSA Findings
Echo Those of 9/11 Commission," front page, June
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/wpni.printarticle/sunday/outlook;dir=columnsnode;dir=print;dir=sunday;dir=outlook;dir=columns;page=article;kw
=;ad=ss;ad=bb;ad=hp;pos=ad26;sz=300x250;tile=20;abr=!ie;ord=1088301192343?)
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/wpni.printarticle/sunday/outlook;dir=columnsnod
e;dir=print;dir=sunday;dir=outlook;dir=columns;page=article;kw=;ad=ss;ad=bb;ad
=hp;pos=ad27;sz=160x600;tile=20;abr=!ie;ord=1088301192344?)
(http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/wpni.printarticle/sunday/outlook;dir=columnsnode;dir=print;dir=
sunday;dir=outlook;dir=columns;page=article;kw=;ad=ss;ad=bb;ad=hp;pos=ad24;sz=
336x850;tile=20;abr=!ie;ord=1088301192344?)
<NITF>I operate a small fleet of Cessna aircraft that carry traffic reporters
for local radio stations. Just about a year ago on the afternoon of Tuesday,
June 10, 2003, one of my planes was headed west over Interstate 66 in
Manassas. The aircraft was operating under a TSA-issued waiver, and it was in
radio
contact with controllers at Dulles Airport and at a nearby approach-control
facility in whose airspace it was operating. In short, it was exactly where
it was supposed to be, and it was doing exactly what it was supposed to be
<NITF>However, some unnamed security official decided that my airplane was a
threat and dispatched a military jet from Andrews Air Force Base to intercept
<NITF>Air traffic controllers whose airspace the military plane passed
through were told that the jet was coming, but that was all. Nobody had any
idea
whom or what the military jet was looking for, and its pilot either did not
have the capability or chose not to communicate directly with the controllers.
Thus, the jet was inside a heavily congested airspace traveling at speeds of
as much as 560 knots with controllers and other aircraft relegated to the
status of spect
<NITF>It was only when this jet started circling our aircraft that we figured
out that he was looking for us. The jet circled us for several minutes until
the controller was able to get through to someone to call him off. All this
over a target moving away from the city on a route flown four or five times a
day by the same air
<NITF>This situation was somewhat worse than the similar case this month
because it disrupted airline traffic at two airports and because of the hazards
associated with a cat-and-mouse game that took place at a relatively low
altitude directly over a congested interstate highway. But the core issues are
exactly the same -- lack of coordination, common sense and accountab
<NITF>In both cases, the aircraft in question were operating in an air
traffic control environment and in clearly defined airspace. A person with even
the most limited understanding of the area would have been able to discern what
control tower or approach controller was responsible for the airspace in
which the plane was located. A reasonable reaction would have included a phone
call to that facility or controller to inquire about the status of the
aircraft
in question. In both cases, that would have been the end of the
<NITF>However, both times the security people involved either were not smart
enough or chose not to make that phone call. Instead, intercepts were
initiated at great expense. At least in our case, that intercept caused huge
disruptions and safety pro
<NITF>I did my best to get to the root of the problem so that at least I
would have some assurance that it wouldn't happen again. I got nowhere. From
the
outset, it seemed clear that the FAA didn't have a lot to do with what
happened and that the decisions that went wrong were made on the security s
<NITF>I had been given a local number to call. I then was referred to a
military installation that turned out to be in Florida. From there I was handed
off to someone else. A number of the folks to whom I spoke promised to have
someone call back to help sort things out, but that never happened. In the end,
I was never able to pin down just who was responsible or even where that
person might have been located at the time of the incident. What was doubly
frustrating was the number of military officials to whom I spoke along the way
who
didn't see a problem with any of
<NITF>We are now hearing that the air traffic controller involved in the June
9 incident was dismissed, which I also find troubling. Are we to understand
that it is the controller's fault that the security people didn't bother to
pick up the phone and ask someone about this plane -- just as they didn't
bother to do a year before on June 10, 2003? What's wrong with this pi
<NITF>The air traffic control system was never intended as a security device;
it's there to help airplanes get from one place to the next without bumping
into one another in the air or on the ground. My experience in almost a
quarter-century of flying has been that it does a good job. The controllers in
our area, whose jobs have gotten incredibly more complex since Sept. 11, 2001,
are doing a terrific job under difficult circumstances. My operation also
deals on a daily basis with a variety of aviation security folks, and they
generally seem to be on top of things and eager to make things
<NITF>But, clearly, somewhere, there's a disconnect that can lead to
spectacular failures. Procedures need to be cleaned up, the lines of
communication
clearly established, and some accountability and common sense put in p
<NITF>Above all, the higher-ups at TSA and in the military have to understand
that they've got to change the way they do business. Otherwise, it's only a
matter of time before someone gets injured or killed as a result of one of
these fou
-- Stan Fetter
manages Hyde Field in Clinton.
Other related posts:
- » [JYO] Airhead Approach to Safe Skies