[juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- From: James Zuelow <e5z8652@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: juneau-lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 17:02:50 -0900
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:34:42 -0800
"James Zuelow" <jamesz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here=92s an example:
>
> lp|Network HP:\
> :lp=3D/dev/null:sh:mx#0:rm=3D10.200.9.70:rp=3Dtext:\
> :sd=3D/var/spool/lpd:lf=3D/var/log/lpd-errs:
>
> This prints to a printer at 10.200.9.70, using the text queue. HP
> JetDirects usually have a raw queue that is more appropriate, especially
> if you are using postscript. (replace the rp:text with rp:raw)
>
Err, here's an example sent with a *nix mail reader (have to use Outlook at
work):
This one is for an HP LaserJet 5M with a JetDirect card in it, generated by
Printtool. Lots of extra settings in it you probably don't need. Notice that
in this case the queue (rp:) is set to AUTO, which makes it simpler to print
to. The above example (rp:text) will let you print text files to a printer
that does not understand PostScript, which can be cool in certain situations.
# REMOTE POSTSCRIPT 600x600 letter (HPLaserJet5M_PS)
lp1:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/lp1:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:\
:rm=192.168.0.185:\
:rp=AUTO:\
:lpd_bounce=true:\
:if=/usr/lib/printfilters/master-filter:\
:ppdfile=/usr/share/postscript/ppd/HP_LaserJet_5M.ppd:\
:PAPERSIZE=letter:\
:DESIRED_TO=ps:\
:PRINTER_TYPE=REMOTE:\
:ASCII_TO_PS=YES:\
:GSDEVICE=POSTSCRIPT:\
:RESOLUTION=600x600:\
:PS_SEND_EOF=YES:\
:NUP=1:\
:RTLFTMAR=18:\
:TOPBOTMAR=18:\
:TEXT_SEND_EOF=NO:
And here's the original without the Outlook added strangeness:
lp|Network HP:\
:lp=/dev/null:sh:mx#0:rm=10.200.9.70:rp=auto:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:
Cheers,
James
------------------------------------
This is the Juneau-LUG mailing list.
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to juneau-lug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
word unsubscribe in the subject header.
- References:
- [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- From: Sean Crites
- [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- From: James Zuelow
Other related posts:
- » [juneau-lug] really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- From: Sean Crites
- [juneau-lug] Re: really headless?
- From: James Zuelow