[juneau-lug] Re: Microsoft and Microprocessors?
- From: Tony <tony.taylor@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: juneau-lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:19:06 -0800
They have stifled microprocessor development. Several times, Intel
wanted to diverge from complete backwards compatibility, to make a leap
forward in processor technology. For instance, the way memory is
managed in their Pentium 4 is not significantly different from the way
it is managed on a 386, which was constrained by the historical 16-bit
compatibility issues with the 8086/8088. This was forced by Microsoft
at the time for the purpose of backwards compatibility.
There is a similar story with the Alpha. Microsoft hamstrung the Alpha
(the fastest chip on the market, bar none) by using it only in 32-bit
mode, which made it cost-innefective. There is a strong argument that,
had NT made use of the Alpha's power, DEC would have been able to push
NT into the server room much sooner. But, because of the technical
limitations of NT, and Microsoft's dominant market, DEC was stuck
selling a few Alphas for VMS (and later Digital Unix), and that's about it.
The question comes down to a simple thought-experiment. Is the world
better off with one kind of processor, or many? If you are from the
camp that a single, de-facto standard processor is better than many
divergent, incompatible processors, then Microsoft has been a windfall
for processor design. If you feel that several competing processors are
good for the market, then Microsoft has emmasculated the market.
I am of the later group. Look at the way Apple handled the transition
to the PowerPC (which suffered similar problems with
backward-compatiblity as the Intel line, but to a lesser extent): it was
a little rough for the users, but Apple came out a stronger company,
with better products.
I could carry this discussion over to the entire computer, as right now
the bottleneck for the PC is not the processor, but the IO subsystem.
But in that argument, peripheral and PC manufacturers are also culpable.
Anyway, that's my analysis. As always, I could be wrong.
- Tony
Jeremy C. Hansen wrote:
> I am not old enough to remember, but I must ask... What has Microsoft
> done for the construction of microprocessors? It would seem to me from
> a investment standpoint that they had quite the influence.
>
> Jeremy
------------------------------------
This is the Juneau-LUG mailing list.
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to juneau-lug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the
word unsubscribe in the subject header.
- References:
- [juneau-lug] Microsoft and Microprocessors?
- From: Jeremy C. Hansen
Other related posts:
- » [juneau-lug] Microsoft and Microprocessors?
- » [juneau-lug] Re: Microsoft and Microprocessors?
- [juneau-lug] Microsoft and Microprocessors?
- From: Jeremy C. Hansen