I can do 7 or 8 on Thursday. -Geoff On Feb 4, 2008 8:47 AM, Jonathan Laird <jlaird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thursday at 7 pm, or 8 pm should be fine for me. If need be and Sam's > alright with it, we can start a little earlier, maybe at 7:30 pm since Kevin > is 3 hrs ahead and Sam can join a little later. > > On 2/3/08, Kevin Lee <colmustang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yeah, that sounds good. Attached is a very rough document that talks a > > little about the three different projects (more for the sake of getting > > ideas on to paper). Consider it more of an exploratory paper than > > anything...are you guys available Thurs Feb 7 @ 7:00PM PT to meet > > online? > > If not, what's the best time? > > > > Good to hear we're motivated! > > > > Kev > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jobtransit-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:jobtransit-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sam Talaie > > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 9:04 PM > > To: jobtransit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [jobtransit] Re: Specs > > > > Hey, > > > > I don't have any personal experience. I've taken some > > entrepreneurship courses both in undergrad and here at ucla. I'm also > > seeing how people at my company and how a couple other people in know > > (one from ucla, @kevin: remember Ryan, the surfer guy who was in the > > crypto group, he is starting one). Certain projects might need some > > chunk of funding due to their initial costs (programmers, services, > > lawyers, etc.) prior to really developing anything. I know that there > > are different rounds of funding and that usually it starts with angel > > investors who front the very initial costs so develop, before the > > company has something to approach VCs with (i.e. a working prototype). > > > > To do things right and have a good system it's usually a good idea to > > bring on somebody with tons of experience (+5yrs) to help architect > > the system. I have no doubt about our technical skills, but having > > someone with technical skills as well as business experience to help > > us define the product and maket it to VC's is not a bad idea. For > > example, my friend who started a company brought on a former Berkeley > > prof turned entrepreneur as cofounder. I am not saying we need > > someone of that caliber, but we should approach it somewhat like this > > so we don't get compeletely ignored or taken advantage of when we go > > to get funding. > > > > I also think we'll need more money than usual due to the application. > > Video is gonna require lots of bandwidth and perhaps storage (we will > > probably want to allow users to save previous interviews or download > > them or something). > > > > Anyway, just some thoughts I had today as I watch everyone around me > > do a startup. We should jump on this though before somebody beats us > > to the punch. (i think that's the right idiom). > > > > -sam > > > > > > On Feb 2, 2008 4:58 PM, Jonathan Laird <jlaird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Whether or not this is the best path to take, I think Sam has a good > > point > > > in spec-ing out one of the lower hanging fruits to see how it > > looks. We > > > won't know till we try. > > > > > > Sam - It sounds like you have some experience with this - since you > > know > > > about approaching a lawyer and Venture Capitol Firms..? What else > > have > > you > > > done in the past? > > > > > > I guess I should resume working on the business plan since that's also > > > equally important... > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 2008 3:55 PM, Sam Talaie <stalaie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > > What do you say we start a specs doc? I think the lowest hanging > > > > fruit right now is the video interview portal. I've seen 3 people I > > > > know recently do startups. I think if we can hammer out the specs > > and > > > > get the idea down, we can approach a lawyer and some VC's. > > > > > > > > -sam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >