RE: reply to sender
- From: "Cy Selfridge" <cyselfridge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:05:39 -0600
Yadiel, Yes, in theory. (LOLLOLLOL) The problem is that from the past several versions of JAWS the "reply to sender" has been hit and miss. (frownie face) Cy, The Anasazi From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yadiel Sotomayor Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:12 PM To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: reply to sender When the computer means "reply to sender", it means the original sender of the messege. Since the list is the one sending us the messeges the list appears as the "sender". What's the science and fuzz of all this. Just press jaws key, shift and R and there you go. From: Cy Selfridge <mailto:cyselfridge@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:15 PM To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: reply to sender Dorothy, Not only does the wind need to be in your favor but you must also be sure that the moon is in the proper phase. Cy From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dorothy Ingram-Gorban Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:20 PM To: org, jfw@freelists. Subject: reply to sender sorry about my last email , I find davids way more reliable and have just done it twice this evening on xp laptop using Jaws 11,it will also work on windows 7 using msoutlook but the message must be open first of course it does help if the wind direction is in your favour ! Yadiel Sotomayor yadosotomayor@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reply to sender
- From: Yadiel Sotomayor
- Re: reply to sender
- References:
- reply to sender
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- RE: reply to sender
- From: Cy Selfridge
- Re: reply to sender
- From: Yadiel Sotomayor
- reply to sender
Other related posts:
- » reply to sender
- » Re: reply to sender
- » reply to sender - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » reply to sender - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » Re: reply to sender - Chris Hallsworth
- » Re: reply to sender - George Marshall
- » reply to sender? - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » Re: reply to sender? - chris hallsworth
- » Re: reply to sender? - David
- » Re: reply to sender? - Dave Carlson
- » Re: reply to sender? - Dave Carlson
- » Re: reply to sender? - David
- » Re: reply to sender? - David
- » RE: reply to sender? - Victoria E. Gilkerson
- » Re: reply to sender? - Gary King
- » RE: reply to sender? - Cy Selfridge
- » RE: reply to sender? - Cy Selfridge
- » Re: reply to sender? - larelishumate
- » Re: reply to sender? - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » reply to sender - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » Re: reply to sender - David
- » Re: reply to sender - Gerardo Corripio
- » RE: reply to sender - Cy Selfridge
- » Re: reply to sender - Devona
- » Re: reply to sender - Devona
- » Re: reply to sender - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » reply to sender - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » reply to sender - Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- » RE: reply to sender - Cy Selfridge
- » Re: reply to sender - Yadiel Sotomayor
- » Re: reply to sender - Farfar Carlson
- » RE: reply to sender - Cy Selfridge
- » Re: reply to sender - Yadiel Sotomayor
- » Re: reply to sender - Farfar Carlson
- » Re: reply to sender - Devona
- » Re: reply to sender - Devona
- » Re: reply to sender - Devona
- » Re: reply to sender - Devona
- » Re: reply to sender - Yadiel Sotomayor
- » Re: reply to sender - Farfar Carlson