ah, so if I run as much as I can out board, how low can the speed get and still be reasonable or as I am really trying to get it, how fast is too fast? ----- Original Message ----- From: "trouble" <trouble1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:49 AM Subject: Re: jaws and processor speed: Well I run a athilon 1.47, 512 ram abit k7 board with a gforce 64 mb onboard video, and don't have much of a slow down except in the op. Because of a lot of my test work I do I still run 98 and that makes me run a memory manager, but I still got speed the manager just keeps me from rebooting all the time witch 98 is prone to. I have had xp on the box and still no slow down. With a nice chip and 512 ddr you shouldn't see any lack of speed on xp, but if your going to use a lot of the on board stuff then like I said 2 gig chips are pricing nice now. At 08:22 AM 1/16/04 -0500, you wrote: >but what about the processor speed, which is what I am after. I ask again >because jaws is the bottle neck here and I have seen fast systems with >eloquence slow to a crawl even with an audio adaptor that is not built in. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "trouble" <trouble1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:08 AM >Subject: Re: jaws and processor speed: > > >I would say anything around 512 ddr should work good, and with the prices >of chips you may want to think of 2 gig or higher depending on board. > >At 07:39 AM 1/16/04 -0500, you wrote: > >I'm looking for benchmarks for a specification I'm working up to build a >pc. > >I want to know the most benifitial ram speed with jaws as the main > >consideration and of course, I will want to watch and maybe burn dvds, burn > >cds, run broad band and do streaming and such as well as word processing >but > >not a lot of high end stuff and not open too much at once. I will be using > >an external synthesizer but want a good audio card. I will be getting a > >32-bit card with a gig of ram on it if I can just to take the video off the > >processor as much as possible. I don't need a 128 bit card because I am >not > >doing cad/cam or high end gaming or modeling super sonic air craft or > >sending a space ship to the moon at least not yet. > > > >So, I might actually be quite comfortable with a 1.6 gb processor for > >instance unless all that high powered stuff I want including my 80 gb fast > >hd and my 40x optical drives just won't be supported by it. I don't want > >the pc to crawl, I don't want jaws to pull the system down too much either. > > > >I'm asking this because I have seen a lot of systems that run super fast > >without jaws but quite slowly with jaws and some that run super fast >without > >jaws and even though slower with jaws, still pretty fast so It got me to > >thinking that some bench marking might be in order becuase I don't want to > >spend a lot of money for nothing, on he other hand, if a 3.3 ghz processor > >will enhance the performance of jaws, well... > > > > > >-- > >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to > >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > >Tim >trouble > > >-- >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > > >-- >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Tim trouble -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.