Re: jaws and processor speed:
- From: trouble <trouble1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:17:26 -0500
it won't be as fast as the 2.4, but I really don't think you will notice
the difference except in price.
At 08:51 AM 1/16/04 -0500, you wrote:
>yes, we have one here too with the same specs you list below and it is quite
>fast. Do you think 2.0 would be percieved as fast?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pranav Lal" <nomad42@xxxxxxxx>
>To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:36 AM
>Subject: Re: jaws and processor speed:
>
>
>Hi David,
>
>I have an Intel 2.4GHZ processor with 512MB of ram. The computer has an
>onboard video card and JFW and cd-burning and dvd playing work fine. The
>system is very fast at least according to my perception.
>
>Pranav
>At 06:09 PM 1/16/2004, you wrote:
> >I'm looking for benchmarks for a specification I'm working up to build a
>pc.
> >I want to know the most benifitial ram speed with jaws as the main
> >consideration and of course, I will want to watch and maybe burn dvds, burn
> >cds, run broad band and do streaming and such as well as word processing
>but
> >not a lot of high end stuff and not open too much at once. I will be using
> >an external synthesizer but want a good audio card. I will be getting a
> >32-bit card with a gig of ram on it if I can just to take the video off the
> >processor as much as possible. I don't need a 128 bit card because I am
>not
> >doing cad/cam or high end gaming or modeling super sonic air craft or
> >sending a space ship to the moon at least not yet.
> >
> >So, I might actually be quite comfortable with a 1.6 gb processor for
> >instance unless all that high powered stuff I want including my 80 gb fast
> >hd and my 40x optical drives just won't be supported by it. I don't want
> >the pc to crawl, I don't want jaws to pull the system down too much either.
> >
> >I'm asking this because I have seen a lot of systems that run super fast
> >without jaws but quite slowly with jaws and some that run super fast
>without
> >jaws and even though slower with jaws, still pretty fast so It got me to
> >thinking that some bench marking might be in order becuase I don't want to
> >spend a lot of money for nothing, on he other hand, if a 3.3 ghz processor
> >will enhance the performance of jaws, well...
> >
> >
> >--
> >To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> >jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
>
>
>--
>To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
>jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Tim
trouble
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
