RE: jaws 9.0.552

  • From: "Chris Hallsworth" <christopherhallsworth71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 23:13:16 +0100

Hi, personally I would stay with 9.0.552. I had issues with the latest 9.0,
build 2152, and had to revert back to build 552. Sorry I can't be of any
more help, but just my £0.02 worth anyway. 

-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Carlo Flores
Sent: Thursday May 01 2008 10:25PM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: jaws 9.0.552

hello all, I'm just confusing between the jaws 9.0.552 and the latest
version of 9.0. I would like to know if there is a big changes in to the
latest version? if yes, please let me know what they are.because I'm using
jaws 9.552.
Thanks in advance.

--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list: 
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: