Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: "Francis Daniels" <fdaniels@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:58:30 -0800
Hi Daniel,
The progress announcement follows how the download of the page progresses.
Depending on Internet traffic, it might start slowly because of a graphic and
then speed up when the traffic allows it. JAWS is just following this. When
we didn't have it, I would monitor the page download by Insert Page Down. When
I heard "Done Internet," I knew the page was fully loaded. Personally, I like
the progress announcement, but I know that if I don't want it, I can turn it
off.
Francis
--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: Yardbird
- References:
- Jaws 6.0 question
- From: Wendy Alling
- jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: Bill
- Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: Yardbird
Other related posts:
- » jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » RE: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » RE: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » RE: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » RE: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » RE: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- » Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: Yardbird
- Jaws 6.0 question
- From: Wendy Alling
- jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: Bill
- Re: jaws 6 .0 best feature bad implementation
- From: Yardbird