in text processing, I check, speak dollar in punctuation mode, controlled by jaws in numeric date processing I have it set, to some In number processing, controlled by synthesizer, in both 4.51 and 5.0 and they both read the same, one thousand and phone numbers read, two hundred thirteen, four hundred six,forty four fifty five if they do not read the same, and they are both set the same way, in configuration manager, you might consider running repair on both, and see if they read the same with default setting in a document, with numbers and change one setting at a time, in both versions, i know, it is a pain, to do it methodicly, but it might have to be done. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:35 AM Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0 Hi all, I also found a difference in how Jaws reads numbers in 4.5x verses 5.0. I currently have both 4.51 and 5.00844 on my system. In my text settings for number processing, I have it set to control by synthesizer for both versions, which is the default setting. For example: In 4.51, the number one thousand reads correctly, One thousand. In 5.0, it reads, one zero zero zero. Now in text processing, there is a setting for number processing to read full numbers. This makes Jaws read numbers correctly except when it comes to numbers like phone numbers and social security numbers. I did call FS and report this difference, but I am not sure any correction will be made. Chris Chaffin ----- Original Message ----- From: <ptusing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 12:55 AM Subject: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0 > Hi, > In Word the numbers twelve and thirteen, for example, are read as > twelve and thirteen using JAWS 4.5119 but are read as > one two and one three using 45.0884. > > Is there a way to get them read the same? > > Thanks and I submitted note to > support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > about the JAWS halting of speech in Word X P. > Have a fine week end. > > -- > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx