Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0

  • From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 21:35:18 +0200

Chris, that's exactly what happened to me! Thanks so much for sharing. At
least I know it's a bug and not my own JAWS's problem.

Fran

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0


> Hi,
> I have worked allot in the custom punctuation dialog of the configuration
> manager.  I don't find that it totally works like it should!  I made some
> changes in punctuation before and when it didn't work like I wanted it to,
I
> tried to use the reset to default button, and it did not work!  The only
way
> I could reset it back to the way it was originally was to do a Jaws
repair.
> I realize this portion of the configuration manager is new with Jaws 5.0,
> and I figure there is just some bugs that have to be worked out.
> Chris Chaffin
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 1:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
>
>
> > Chris,
> > that's a great idea I hadn't thought about! I was thinking there might
be
> a
> > way to tell JAWS not to read the apostrophe using the dictionary
manager.
> I
> > didn't mean word by word but that will surely work!
> >
> > In JAWS 5 it is possible to customize punctuation. I selected the
> > apostrophe, clicked on "edit description" and deleted the word
apostrophe.
> > As a result, strangely all punctuations were set to NONE and I had to
run
> a
> > repair to restore it to ALL!! What did I do wrong?!
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Fran
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:35 PM
> > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> >
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > > I never thought of trying to manipulate the words with apostrophe with
> the
> > > Jaws dictionary.  That was a good idea, and I did try some things that
> you
> > > can try to see if it also works on your system!  I tried it with
> eloquence
> > > and with my deck talk express, and it works for both of them.  Go to
the
> > > default dictionary manager so the changes you make will work in all
> > > programs.
> > > For each new entry just hit the add button, type in the original word,
> > then
> > > type in your change and hit okay.  When you leave the dictionary
> manager,
> > it
> > > will ask you if you want to save the changes, and just say yes!  Here
> are
> > > the changes I made:
> > > don't to doughnt
> > > hasn't to has unt
> > > haven't to have unt
> > > isn't to is unt
> > > It's to its
> > > I am sure there are more changes you can make, but this is all I did
so
> > far!
> > > Notice the spelling of the changed word.
> > > Hope this helps!
> > > Chris Chaffin
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 12:18 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thank you. Is there a way to correct the apostrophe problem still
> > keeping
> > > > punctuation to ALL? Can something be done using the dictionary
> manager,
> > > for
> > > > instance?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks so much
> > > >
> > > > Fran
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:53 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > The apostrophe problem is an eloquence problem, and FS does know
> about
> > > > this
> > > > > problem.  I reported it to them back when Jaws 5.00844 was
> originally
> > > > > released.  They personally contacted me, and let me know that the
> > > problem
> > > > > was turned over to their developers, and hopefully it would be
> > corrected
> > > > in
> > > > > a future release of Jaws.
> > > > > Chris Chaffin
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 11:16 AM
> > > > > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi guys,
> > > > > > I also found a diference in the way JFW 5 reads numbers. But my
> real
> > > > > problem
> > > > > > is the apostrophe. I like to keep punctuation set to ALL, and
this
> > way
> > > > > JAWS
> > > > > > 5 will always read the ' sign as "apostrophe", so that for
> instance,
> > > the
> > > > > > word it's is read "it apostrophe s, instead of "its"". Does it
> > happen
> > > to
> > > > > any
> > > > > > of you? Actually this also happens with 4.5, but it didn't
happen
> > with
> > > > > 4.2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fran
> > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > > From: "curmudgeon les" <one2three4five6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 3:43 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > in text processing,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I check, speak dollar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > in punctuation mode, controlled by jaws
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > in numeric date processing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have it set, to some
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In number processing, controlled by synthesizer,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > in both 4.51 and 5.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and they both read the same,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > one thousand
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and phone numbers read,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > two hundred thirteen, four hundred six,forty four fifty five
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if they do not read the same, and they are both set the same
> way,
> > in
> > > > > > > configuration manager,
> > > > > > > you might consider running repair on both, and see if they
read
> > the
> > > > same
> > > > > > > with default setting
> > > > > > > in a document,  with numbers
> > > > > > > and change one setting at a time,
> > > > > > > in both versions,
> > > > > > > i know, it is a pain, to do it methodicly, but it might have
to
> be
> > > > done.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > > > From: "Chris Chaffin" <chaffin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:35 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > I also found a difference in how Jaws reads numbers in 4.5x
> verses
> > > > 5.0.
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > currently have both 4.51 and 5.00844 on my system.  In my text
> > > > settings
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > number processing, I have it set to control by synthesizer for
> > both
> > > > > > > versions, which is the default setting.  For example:
> > > > > > > In 4.51, the number one thousand reads correctly, One
thousand.
> > > > > > > In 5.0, it reads, one zero zero zero.
> > > > > > > Now in text processing, there is a setting for number
processing
> > to
> > > > read
> > > > > > > full numbers.  This makes Jaws read numbers correctly except
> when
> > it
> > > > > comes
> > > > > > > to numbers like phone numbers and social security numbers.
> > > > > > > I did call FS and report this difference, but I am not sure
any
> > > > > correction
> > > > > > > will be made.
> > > > > > > Chris Chaffin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > > > > From: <ptusing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 12:55 AM
> > > > > > > Subject: Reading differences between 4.51 and 5.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > In  Word the  numbers twelve and thirteen, for example, are
> read
> > > as
> > > > > > > > twelve and thirteen using JAWS 4.5119  but are read as
> > > > > > > > one two and one three using 45.0884.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is there a way to get them read the same?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks and I submitted note to
> > > > > > > > support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > about the JAWS halting of speech in Word X P.
> > > > > > > > Have a fine week end.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > > > > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the
> subject
> > > > line.
> > > > > > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from
> the
> > > > list,
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list.
> > Rather
> > > > > > contact
> > > > > > > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > > > > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the
> subject
> > > > line.
> > > > > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from
the
> > > list,
> > > > or
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > way the list is being run, do not post them to the list.
Rather
> > > > contact
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > > > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the
subject
> > > line.
> > > > > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from
the
> > > list,
> > > > or
> > > > > > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list.
> Rather
> > > > > contact
> > > > > > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
> > line.
> > > > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the
> > list,
> > > or
> > > > > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list.
Rather
> > > > contact
> > > > > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
> line.
> > > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > > >
> > > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the
> list,
> > or
> > > > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> > > contact
> > > > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject
line.
> > > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > > >
> > > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the
list,
> or
> > > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> > contact
> > > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> > jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> > >
> > > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list,
or
> > the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
> contact
> > the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > --
> > To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> > Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
> >
> > If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact
> the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: