JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: "Tusing" <ptusing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 20:51:59 -0500
Greetings,
Although I do appreciate the effort behind and the great value of using
JAWS:
I am hearing from a growing--but not scientific-polled group of people
who
are reporting problems.
Their issue which I do not wish to become my issue or your issue is due
to stress or repeat motion strain on the hands due to the increased number
of keystrokes we get to use as years go by.
Being fair, we do have Internet keystrokes which work to a certain
extent: however, the inability to "remove" totally blank lines from the
web page reading experience has such people abandoning 5.
Very few people keyboard constantly as we screen reader users do as our
software is keyboard driven and the increased risk of carpel tunnel
syndrome is always there.
Why can't F S give us a toggle for "lessening" the number of totally blank
lines since the Internet keystrokes although O K--certainly are not 100%.
Why can't we "choose" to turn "off" totally blank lines on some or
all web sites?
After all, if JAWS can encounter text then one can surely program to locate
(and hopefully) remove totally blank lines.
Repeat use damage can ruin a career.
Thank you.
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: David Poehlman
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: Roy Nickelson
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: Steggalls
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: Dale Leavens
- References:
- stupid jaws
- From: Tim
Other related posts:
- » JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » RE: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » RE: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » RE: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- » Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: David Poehlman
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: Roy Nickelson
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: Steggalls
- Re: JAWS--good product--potential problem
- From: Dale Leavens
- stupid jaws
- From: Tim