RE: JAWS 64 bit authorization question
- From: "Ch.B." <chr1s64@xxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 20:13:51 +0100
The idea behind it itself is really not a bad one. it was created to kind of
lower chances of outside interference, i.e. malware that somehow gets into
your system to not be able to execute any programs to alter your system. On
the other hand I am sure that if some malware really wants to get on they
have ways to outsmart uac probably too. There is never any 100% percent
security other than turning off your pc altoghether lol.
While UAC in itself may be a good thing it also, at the same time, gets in
the way all the time when you the user are trying to install stuff or manage
your system, because it has no way of distinguishing between the user or
some other interference To me, that is a feature I don't want, as I have
taken other precautions to keep those malware possibilities out, in the
first place. But like I said to each his own.
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
Alternative archives located at:
http://n2.nabble.com/JAWS-for-Windows-f2145279.html
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
