Re: FS In Good Company
- From: "Kelly Pierce" <kpierce2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 06:57:01 -0500
If a Google search is performed on the words
freedom scientific chandler
one will find a number of results including:
http://www.afb.org/afbpress/pub.asp?DocID=aw020102
from the AFB. It described how Richard Chandler attended CSun one year,
found an interest in the adaptive technology industry, and connected with
some entrepreneurs who had started companies and wanted to cash out.
Kelly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: FS In Good Company
I've read this passage over a few times, but I don't yet understand what
it
means. I'm familiar with the history of the Los Angeles Times, including
the
transfer of controlling interest from the Chandler family to the Tribune
Company, a change I think has been very unfortunate for the times in
terms
of operating budget, first and foremost. Not quite catastrophic, but
close
to it. What I'd like to know is what do you mean by this sentence. Please
understand, I'm not arguing with you. I'm saying I literally don't
understand what you're saying, here. The passage says that the Chandler
family formerly owned Freedom Scientific, and goes on to imply that you
have
a low opinion of the manner in which they managed it. So far as I'm
aware,
the Chandlers never have owned Freedom Scientific. Am I mistaken? Has
this
company been one of their holdings until now?
Thanks.
you wrote:
somehow you think the Chandler family of Los Angeles, the former owner of
Freedom Scientific, was just as good as Ted Hinter or Dean blazie and
will
be better than the Kuwaitis who bought it.
-- I disagree. They combined a
hardware company and a software company, which is rarely done in the
technology industry, and never really took on the job of integrating
products. they avoided the real work of product integration and
apparently
lost patience with FS as they did with the Tribune Company, recently
forcing its sale. With Tribune, they weren't happy with 20 percent
profits
but a stagnant share price so they demanded liquidation.
Kelly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Norma A. Boge-Conyers" <naboge@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: FS In Good Company
I was not concerned when the HJ products became part of FS. This sale,
however, does concern me. As a JFW owner (along with a couple of FS
notetakers) I am concerned about technical support, updates as free from
bugs as possible, cost containment, the whole bit. I wonder what
incentive the new owners will have to not only sell product but keep the
blind and VI community happy and informed customers. Will they even hire
blind folks or farm the tech support out to somebody in India? Will they
bother to send people to conventions and CSUN and the like? I know, so
many questions and no answers yet. But I feel these are things to think
about. Hopefully we will hear something official from FS soon regarding
these matters. Take care, Norma
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact
the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.1/805 - Release Date: 5/15/2007
10:47 AM
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or
the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather
contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Adrian Spratt
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Yardbird
- References:
- FS In Good Company
- From: Gary King
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Norma A. Boge-Conyers
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Kelly Pierce
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Yardbird
Other related posts:
- » FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » RE: FS In Good Company
- » RE: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » RE: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » RE: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » RE: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » RE: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
- » Re: FS In Good Company
transfer of controlling interest from the Chandler family to the TribuneCompany, a change I think has been very unfortunate for the times in terms of operating budget, first and foremost. Not quite catastrophic, but close
to it. What I'd like to know is what do you mean by this sentence. Please understand, I'm not arguing with you. I'm saying I literally don't understand what you're saying, here. The passage says that the Chandlerfamily formerly owned Freedom Scientific, and goes on to imply that you have a low opinion of the manner in which they managed it. So far as I'm aware, the Chandlers never have owned Freedom Scientific. Am I mistaken? Has this
company been one of their holdings until now? Thanks. you wrote: somehow you think the Chandler family of Los Angeles, the former owner ofFreedom Scientific, was just as good as Ted Hinter or Dean blazie and will
be better than the Kuwaitis who bought it. -- I disagree. They combined a hardware company and a software company, which is rarely done in the technology industry, and never really took on the job of integratingproducts. they avoided the real work of product integration and apparently
lost patience with FS as they did with the Tribune Company, recentlyforcing its sale. With Tribune, they weren't happy with 20 percent profits
but a stagnant share price so they demanded liquidation. Kelly----- Original Message ----- From: "Norma A. Boge-Conyers" <naboge@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 6:19 PM Subject: Re: FS In Good Company
I was not concerned when the HJ products became part of FS. This sale, however, does concern me. As a JFW owner (along with a couple of FS notetakers) I am concerned about technical support, updates as free from bugs as possible, cost containment, the whole bit. I wonder what incentive the new owners will have to not only sell product but keep the blind and VI community happy and informed customers. Will they even hire blind folks or farm the tech support out to somebody in India? Will they bother to send people to conventions and CSUN and the like? I know, so many questions and no answers yet. But I feel these are things to think about. Hopefully we will hear something official from FS soon regarding these matters. Take care, Norma -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfwIf you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.1/805 - Release Date: 5/15/2007 10:47 AM -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfwIf you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Adrian Spratt
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Yardbird
- FS In Good Company
- From: Gary King
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Norma A. Boge-Conyers
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Kelly Pierce
- Re: FS In Good Company
- From: Yardbird