Re: Debbie Scales
- From: "Debbie Scales" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 19:17:36 -0400
I know that. I didn't take it badly. She would be thrilled that it is such
a useful resource.
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yardbird" <yardbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: Debbie Scales
Dear Tom,
I don't think any of us were trying to intrude at a moment like this and
ask
for the site to be maintained in a formal way, or anything like that. It
was a hope for the future, for the site to eventually be managed and
updated
by people generous enough to contribute their time and expertise. I'm
sorry
if that wasn't clear. The suggestion was in the spirit of a tribute, not
the demand for service that apparently some well-meaning sympathetic
people
on this list misunderstood it to be.
--
JFW related links:
JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/
Scripting mailing list:
http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Debbie Scales
- From: Rose Combs
- References:
- Re: Which Versions of Adobe Reader Are Accessible on Windows ME
- From: Jessie Neagle
- Debbie Scales
- From: Debbie Scales
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Yardbird
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Judith Bron
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Yardbird
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Debbie Scales
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Yardbird
Other related posts:
- » Debbie Scales
- » Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » RE: Debbie Scales
- » RE: Debbie Scales
- » RE: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » RE: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » RE: Debbie Scales
- » Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » Re: Debbie Scales
- » RE: Debbie Scales
Dear Tom,
I don't think any of us were trying to intrude at a moment like this and ask
for the site to be maintained in a formal way, or anything like that. It
was a hope for the future, for the site to eventually be managed and updated
by people generous enough to contribute their time and expertise. I'm sorry
if that wasn't clear. The suggestion was in the spirit of a tribute, not
the demand for service that apparently some well-meaning sympathetic people
on this list misunderstood it to be.
- RE: Debbie Scales
- From: Rose Combs
- Re: Which Versions of Adobe Reader Are Accessible on Windows ME
- From: Jessie Neagle
- Debbie Scales
- From: Debbie Scales
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Yardbird
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Judith Bron
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Yardbird
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Debbie Scales
- Re: Debbie Scales
- From: Yardbird