RE: Alternative for Screen Reader on remote machine
- From: "Thomas J. Hesley" <pulse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:14:39 -0500
Well, you may not want to use JAWS in remote access if you cannot afford the
JAWS Remote Access License add-on. I think the cost of this ($150 - $300)
is a bit steep personally.
Tom Hesley
-----Original Message-----
From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Harmony Mortimer
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:09 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Alternative for Screen Reader on remote machine
I use JAWS all the time and have the demonstration of 10 on my laptop. Why
would you not want to use it? JAWS is the best I think, followed by hal and
window eyes if I have to.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Pat Pound <DPOUND@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although you wouldn't want this screen reader for daily use, it can allow
you web access with speech output without installing software...
http://webanywhere.cs.washington.edu/
Pat Pound
Other related posts:
