[JAWSLite] Re: Admin: Re: What Would you like to be Available in Future Versions of JAWS?

I know this is late but I just  now got to this thread...
Ok, I have one -- jaws should support the brailliant braille display.  It's 
been 3 years since I got my brailliant and so far the only way I can get it 
to work with my brailliant is by fumbling around jaws program files to 
insert a file and then install a driver.
Why should this be required to use my display and the long list of 25 or 
more displays in its supported list are just there automatically?
Anyway, I'm grumbling.
--le

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "E.J. Zufelt" <everett@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jawslite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: [JAWSLite] Admin: Re: What Would you like to be Available in Future 
Versions of JAWS?


Good evening,

I love that we are discussing features that people would like to see in
JAWS.  Many people have suggestions and don't always know how or where to
send them to get the best attention.  Others don't necessarily know how to
word their requests to get them the attention they deserve.

So, good work on starting this discussion and let's keep it to the topic of
new features and not to who does or does not have the ability to get the
suggestions to the right people.

Thanks,
Everett -- JAWSLite Administrator


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "The Elf" <inthaneelf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jawslite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 11:34 PM
Subject: [JAWSLite] Re: What Would you like to be Available in Future
Versions of JAWS?


> dear lady, it doesn't always take a FS based address to be in contact with
> someone who works there, or for a subsidiary, or has the ear of someone in
> the company.  I have, or have had before some housecleaning, contact info
> on
> three people that work for Microsoft. and not just MS addresses, but
> personal ones as well.
> They are willing to give me a real listen if I write to them about
> something
> specific.
>
> so, though this seems a little out of the ordinary, it's not an
> illegitimate
> question, and may well be someone who has an "IN" that we are not aware
> of.
>
> regards,
> inthane
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Adrian Spratt" <Adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <jawslite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 1:46 PM
> Subject: [JAWSLite] Re: What Would you like to be Available in Future
> Versions of JAWS?
>
>
>> Who are you? Your email address appears to have no connection with FS.
>> There's nothing to stop anyone on this list from sending suggestions
>> directly to FS.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Alice" <alicem.pennington@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <jawslite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:22 PM
>> Subject: [JAWSLite] What Would you like to be Available in Future
>> Versions
>> of JAWS?
>>
>>
>> As you already know, the latest version of JAWS is version 10.
>> Now, I am interested in what you would like to be available in future
>> versions of JAWS. I will try to pass them on to Freedom Scientific.
>> Sorry to those who do not use JAWS!
>>
>> ===================
>> Visit and contribute to The JAWS Script Repository http://jawsscripts.com
>>
>> View the list's information at
>> http://www.freelists.org/list/jawslite
>>
>>
>
>
> ===================
> Visit and contribute to The JAWS Script Repository http://jawsscripts.com
>
> View the list's information at
> http://www.freelists.org/list/jawslite
>

===================
Visit and contribute to The JAWS Script Repository http://jawsscripts.com

View the list's information at
http://www.freelists.org/list/jawslite

===================
Visit and contribute to The JAWS Script Repository http://jawsscripts.com

View the list's information at 
http://www.freelists.org/list/jawslite

Other related posts: