[jaws-uk] Re: Fw: Case notes arival.
- From: "Barry Toner" <barry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jaws-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:07:09 +0100
My apologies for allowing this to go out onto the list. Someone was talking
to me in background and I hit send before changing the command that's et by
default to approve to decline.
This was approved in complete and total error.
JAWS-UK distances itself from the below and any further responses to this
thread will be dealt with harshly.
This is not appropriate for this list.
Thread ends here.
Barry Toner
JAWS-UK Moderator
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: jaws-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jaws-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
Sent: 15 October 2009 16:52
To: jaws-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [jaws-uk] Fw: Case notes arival.
I know you will have to intercept this, just cannotbe helped but one way or
another small battles are bing won rachael is my Mp Pa and Greg clark is
helpful with DDA matters not easy however Dorothy
----- Original Message -----
From: "GODFREY, Rachel" <GODFREYR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Dorothy Ingram-Gorban'" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: RE: Case notes arival.
Many thanks - I'll certainly pass this on to Greg.
Regards
Rachel
Rachel Godfrey
Constituency Manager
Greg Clark MP
Tel: 0207 219 1773
-----Original Message-----
From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban [mailto:dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 October 2009 15:32
To: GODFREY, Rachel
Subject: Re: Case notes arival.
Rachael regarding Liz Woskett the rnib legal girl, I had to break the news
to her in October of
----- Original Message ----- 2006 that the concilliation arm of the DRC as
it was named then had gone into receivrship I had just dealt with a bank
called Ing Direct and got my claim done in time liz was then in Judd Street
not in Peterborough, she was just getting the news in,I remember her
saying"Oh what shall we do all these claims we have in the pipeline and my
saying just do your best with existing claiments, it was luck on my side
getting it through and Greg wrote later to Bob Nivan on my behalf, so it
took 2 years for the Equality and Human Rights act to be drawn up a long
time. liz was unwell for a very long time and is a moorfields patient
herself and is back working Part time down in Peterborough I thought if I
gave this little snapshot Greg would like to know she has some sight but
does not know her future so I have battled with moorfields and she withE.On,
Regards Dorothy Please let Greg see this Email
From: "GODFREY, Rachel" <GODFREYR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Dorothy Ingram-Gorban'" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:02 PM
Subject: RE: Case notes arival.
Dear Mrs Ingram-Gorban
Yes, Greg was shocked to learn that they had been rated weak again. The
Quality Care Commission has pointed out that these targets relate to April
2008, which is only two months after the Trust's new management was
appointed, and that improvements have been made since then.
But I think it's Greg's view that this can't go on and if things don't
improve significantly this year, there should be a change in management.
Regards
Rachel
Rachel Godfrey
Constituency Manager
Greg Clark MP
Tel: 0207 219 1773
-----Original Message-----
From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban [mailto:dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 October 2009 07:15
To: GODFREY, Rachel
Subject: Fw: Case notes arival.
Hallo again In addition greg will hear on the news today the news about
Maidstone Trust and in particular Kent and Sussex, not happy listening I am
not sure what the additional regulations with achieve I am trying to absorb
what they really mean Regards Dorothy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dorothy Ingram-Gorban" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "GODFREY, Rachel" <GODFREYR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:32 PM
Subject: Fw: Case notes arival.
> Just to update you I have lodged my complaint with Health Ombudsman's
> Office and Tim Goss of Icas is putting it all together for me, I do think
> if recommendations are made by an external Body like the health
> ombudsman's office things may improve as long as I can recall my notes
> have vanished and photographs. I am also glad if nothing else Moorfields
> understand the DDA act and are using adept transcription services so other
> patients can ask and not be told "we do not have anything to record
> with,that is perhaps the best I can say I hope Greg is well and I know he
> will be busy of course regards Dorothy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dorothy Ingram-Gorban" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Transcription" <Transcription@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 7:21 PM
> Subject: Fw: Case notes arival.
>
>
>> Hallo Claire if they have lost the ones before the Yag lazer and cataract
>> damage, they were the ones I have been asking for of course I do not
>> think mr Dowler will have forgotten being on radio 4 at all it no doubt
>> generated a good few letters to him and he would have a transcription of
>> the programme he either did not get it at all, like my hand delivered
>> letter taken on April this year for Mr Andrews or more likely did not
>> want to comment upon another Hospitals mistakes namely the maidstone
>> Trust. I hope your reader knows I really do appreciate his efforts and
>> even more I do hope moorfields will use your services so others can have
>> some independence and privacy as for any surgical decision I make I will
>> just have a good think at least I know the worst regards Dorothy
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tate, Helen" <Helen.Tate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Dorothy Ingram-Gorban" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 1:37 PM
>> Subject: RE: Case notes arival.
>>
>>
>> Dear Dorothy
>>
>> As far as I can tell there are no photos from 1990 in your file but can
>> confirm that you now have copies of everyting that is on the file. I
>> appreciate that some of these copies may be difficult to decipher and
>> that is why I suggested you come in to look at the originals.
>>
>> I do not know whether Mr Dowler received your letter but there is
>> certainly no response on the file. After five years I suspect he may not
>> remember himself.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Helen
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban [mailto:dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 14 October 2009 13:30
>> To: Tate, Helen
>> Subject: Re: Case notes arival.
>>
>> thank you I will think about it but can you tell me where any photos
>> are now.
>> please have you got the photos for 1990? as ref letter to Prof Bird
>> several from my Gp Dr P J Ball and finally in 1996 John Bell
>> ophthalmologist, I still have no idea what you have as mentioned if
>> Professor Bird said all my File had gone missing except for a few
>> fragments and I was given a new File what actually is there? also re my
>> letter to Jonathan Dowler which is in the paperwork sent April 2004 did
>> he ever receive it? I did not have any acknowledgement Regards Dorothy
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tate, Helen" <Helen.Tate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Dorothy Ingram-Gorban" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:43 PM
>> Subject: RE: Case notes arival.
>>
>>
>> Dear Dorothy
>>
>> Thank you for your recent emails and it is clear that now you have
>> received the audio tape of your records you have several queries about
>> them which I am probably not going to be able to answer.
>>
>> Would it be helpful for you to come into Moorfields and go through the
>> originals with a member of staff (possibly a nurse)who would then be
>> able to assist with your queries ?
>>
>> If so, please let me know and I will make the necessary arrangements.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Helen
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban [mailto:dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 13 October 2009 16:46
>> To: Tate, Helen
>> Subject: Re: Case notes arival.
>>
>> I have replied but am not sure if the condition of the paperwork you
>> have is decipherable the sheets of pencil and many different
>> Consultants writing were of course impossible to read, as you have the
>> originals they would beI hope understandable by a Consultant? If not a
>> Medical Secretary please letme know the dates of photographs do you have
>> the 1990 that Professor Bird took me himself to have taken? It was after
>> that they gaveme a file with"new patient on it as they had all vanished
>> it seems from prof birds letter of
>> 1996 he says only fragments came to light .dorothy
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Tate, Helen" <Helen.Tate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Dorothy Ingram-Gorban" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Burke, Mary" <Mary.Burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:40 PM
>> Subject: RE: Case notes arival.
>>
>>
>> Dear Dorothy
>>
>> Thank you for letting us know that the copies of your non-written notes
>> and the audio tape of your written notes have now arrived safely.
>>
>> In your email you have asked whether certain letters etc are in your
>> notes and I can confirm that you now have copies of everything that we
>> have here.
>>
>> Yes, Mr Jonathan Dowler does still work here.
>>
>> I do hope you will find both the copies and the tape helpful.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Helen
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban [mailto:dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 12 October 2009 14:00
>> To: Burke, Mary
>> Cc: Tate, Helen
>> Subject: Case notes arival.
>>
>> this is just to let you know the packet of papers and one Tape which is
>> a recording of the notes is now in my hands and I will update you later
>> about anything I cannot understand, I do not have any person here to
>> help me make sense of them however I can say the notes were photocopies
>> and a lot of print did not come out and some was in pencil and on some
>> sheets several different people have written if the photocopies are not
>> readable then of course no reader can make them so. I get the over all
>> impression however because I have a good memory, and I see my Gp who is
>> now retired Peter J Ball of Kingswood Surgery wrote a good many times
>> asking about photographs I had taken in 1990, it took until about 1996
>> for an answer and them only because I told John Bell his Initials Jab
>> are Mr Bell consultant at Pembury Hospital and before Kent and Sussex Mr
>> bell wished me to attend a special Meeting where a large number of
>> Consultants from around the county and further were wanting people with
>> Interesting Case history to spend some hours being examined, I was on
>> that occasion only prepared to go through it all again,on condition Mr
>> bell contacted Professor Bird and ask him about my missing case notes,
>> I then got a letter from Prof Bird with profuse apologies, and I could
>> guess as I have typed in one letter to him that John Bell had nudged
>> Alan, and of course John Bell also said Alan Bird would be at the
>> conference and I then agreed. well Prof Bird was not there and after I
>> had been examined by a fair number of Ophthalmologists I had enough and
>> asked for a taxi home. I wonder if you can tell me do you have any
>> photos taken in 1990? Prof Bird took me by hand to see the photographer
>> I think it was November 17th but you will see. additionally do you have
>> on file my visit to see Donald Macloud? this was perhaps in 1985 in
>> summer I was referred by Mr Salmon of Kent and Sussex, mr Salmon was the
>> Consultant who when I complained of visual problems increasing said"Well
>> dear your retinas are rotting" and when I asked but what about laser
>> treatment said"What do you think Lasers are magic wands" Mr salmon was
>> not meaning to be brutal it was his manner, I knew his Secretary who
>> lived at that time on this hill, she said"I fear he has no idea he
>> upsets people the other day a poor man collapsed in front of him" they
>> had to give him first aid. I told her never mind he is nicknamed "the
>> Big fish, she knew that. it was possibly not known to Mr salmon. I am
>> particularly interested in a letter I wrote to your mr dowler after
>> hearing him on Radio 4 medicine now. I wrote to Professor Bird asking
>> him about it,I seem not to have had a reply from mr Dowler, I may have
>> misspell his name if he is still with you can you tell me? On the radio
>> he said something of great interest which was about cataract surgery and
>> different kinds of lens, he was advising patients who wanted to keep
>> near vision not to have Silicone lenses and my interest of course was
>> after the Cataract and the silicone implants I was never able to read
>> again with the near to centre slot of retina in left eye the day before
>> the surgery I was reading point 14 print Mr Dowler was saying have
>> acrylic lens if you need to have near vision as a priority,please can
>> you see that letter and letme know which are the earliest notes you have
>> and photos. However the detail would need to be read by a Doctor with
>> knowledge about Retinal surgery and front of eye mr John Bell was not
>> willing to do a lens exchange some years ago but now he said he would,so
>> he may have taken training in performing victrectomy I think John Dart
>> doesn't undertake victrectomy one last thing the reader at adept hhad a
>> brave stab at pseudo Fakir actually I think the word bilateral is in
>> front of it. I typed pseudo in my Difine a wordOcr and Fakir and was
>> somewhat astonished at the results. dorothy surgery and I in the light
>> of John Bell's offer I felt the need to have a good look over my past
>> medical notes and case History. Regards Dorothy Ingram Gorban..
>> Before acting on this email or opening any attachments you should read
>> the
>> Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust's email disclaimer
>> available at
>>
>> http://www.moorfields.nhs.uk/Home/emaildisclaimer
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.11/2430 - Release Date:
>> 10/12/09
>> 04:01:00
>> Before acting on this email or opening any attachments you should read
>> the
>> Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust's email disclaimer
>> available at
>>
>> http://www.moorfields.nhs.uk/Home/emaildisclaimer
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.15/2434 - Release Date:
>> 10/13/09
>> 19:11:00
>> Before acting on this email or opening any attachments you should read
>> the Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust's email disclaimer
>> available at
>>
>> http://www.moorfields.nhs.uk/Home/emaildisclaimer
>>
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.15/2434 - Release Date:
>> 10/13/09 19:11:00
>>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.18/2437 - Release Date: 10/15/09
03:57:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.18/2437 - Release Date: 10/15/09
03:57:00
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4511 (20091015) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 4511 (20091015) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
Other related posts:
