[jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- From: "Tristram Llewellyn" <tris-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jaws-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:03:50 +0100
Hi George et al
I'm pretty sure if FS aren't already aware of this we will make them aware
of the sensitive nature of the system. The problem in essence is producing
the code that allows a system to accept that a small degree of change should
not necessarily re-trigger the activation process but yet is stilll
usefullly secure. This is something that is quite difficult to do so I
understand.
Regards.
Tristram Llewellyn
Sight and Sound Technology
Technical Support
www.sightandsound.co.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Bell" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jaws-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2005 6:53 PM
Subject: [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
Hi Gordon,
If moving a PCI card from one slot to another results in it
being necessary to re-activate, then this is something
Freedom Scientific must be made aware of. [Tristram - are
you listening?] Clearly the process is too sensitive. I'm
even a little surprised at the report of a memory upgrade
requiring this.
As regards loosing installs, I doubt you will get an
arguement here. My suggestion would be to simply drop S&S
and line, explaining the situation, and ask them to confirm
that you only have x machine(s) activated.
George.
________________________________
From: jaws-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:jaws-uk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of G.
McFarlane
Sent: 18 May 2005 18:43
To: Jaws UK
Subject: [jaws-uk] Activation
Hi Can anyone help me understand what's going on.
Tristram at SS has been very helpful when I've had
problems with this and reset my activations. However again
recently I needed to change the configuration
of one of my machines and swapped around the PCI
cards. Lo and behold when I rebooted I needed to reactivate.
Why is this necessary when all I did was
change the cards around - I did so to make room for
a new Audigy. This was the only new card. Everything else is
the same.
Does this mean that any time any changes take place
we will need to reactivate? Also if I do reactivate do I
lose one of my 3 activations or is it covered
by the machine number I originally had and was
given?
It seems to me that even Windows XP is not so
sensitive. Things will be OK if I can reactivate without
losing one of my 3 activations but if not, when changes
take place I can imagine that our activation history
may be queried by SS or FS.
I may have misunderstood the activation process - I
look forward to being corrected.
Gordon McFarlane
This Message has been scanned for viruses by McAfee Groupshield.
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** jaws-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- References:
- [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- From: George Bell
Other related posts:
- » [jaws-uk] Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- » [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- [jaws-uk] Re: Activation
- From: George Bell