[iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: Allan Dawes <allan.dawes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: iyonix-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:05:25 +0100
mark.stephens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
In message <48E008B9.90507@xxxxxxxxxx>
John Ballance <jwb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To put it bluntly, we could not make the sums add up! - however hard we
tried.
Before totally abandoning the idea, would you consider running a
'survey' online we can fill in gauging interest at different price
points, etc. You have the mailing lists, your customer/ex-customer
contacts and the SE show coming up, so would at least be able to be
gauge if/what the market interest is and whether it is commercially
viable.
Would Iyonix also consider the idea of getting RISCOS onto a portable
ARM device if they could presell enough units.
As the owners of RISCOS, you are stil a focal point and one most
likely to take the market forward (IMHO).
Regards,
MArk
---
To alter your preferences or leave the group,
visit http://www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
Other info via http://www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
I think a survey would be a very good idea. I recall my brother was
invited by Acorn when the RiscPC was first put on the spotlight, so that
they could get feedback. It was in fact he who suggested 16bit audio,
which then got everyone in the room talking.
Arm tech has one real bonus over the X86/X64 platform - low power
consumption. The reason why Acorn did not do a successor to the A4
laptop, was because at the time it was expensive, bulky, battery
technologies were not as good as they are today. Not to mention that low
res gray scale display would put anyone off.
If an Iyonix 2 could be built to be compact to fit in a laptop, leaving
out expansion slots, and then for the desktop system, a full board
including the expansion slots.
I can only imagine the problems already with a laptop version - who's
casing do you use, and how available is that in 24 months time. Still
portability is, in my opinion, one way forward if it's not going to keep
up with other faster platforms. And no I don't want to run an emulator
under windows. The emulator is fine and all, It's just Windows is heavy
on power and does all the things that make most of us beat our laptops
like Mr Faulty and his car.
- Follow-Ups:
- [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: Xavier Tardy
- [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: aw29009
- References:
- [iyonix-support] iyonix 2 or not
- From: John Ballance
- [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: mark . stephens
Other related posts:
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- » [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
In message <48E008B9.90507@xxxxxxxxxx>
John Ballance <jwb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To put it bluntly, we could not make the sums add up! - however hard we tried.
Before totally abandoning the idea, would you consider running a 'survey' online we can fill in gauging interest at different price points, etc. You have the mailing lists, your customer/ex-customer contacts and the SE show coming up, so would at least be able to be gauge if/what the market interest is and whether it is commercially viable.
Would Iyonix also consider the idea of getting RISCOS onto a portable ARM device if they could presell enough units.
As the owners of RISCOS, you are stil a focal point and one most likely to take the market forward (IMHO).
Regards, MArk ---To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit http://www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support
Other info via http://www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support
- [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: Xavier Tardy
- [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: aw29009
- [iyonix-support] iyonix 2 or not
- From: John Ballance
- [iyonix-support] Re: iyonix 2 or not
- From: mark . stephens