oh ye of little faith.. as my old man used to say..
Greg
http://www.toolzz.com/ISATools/2000tools.htm
It may be a waste but you forgot that I feel better now. That's something. Maybe it's a girl thing.
I also have a habit of creating protocols for stuff that shows up as unidentified traffic. I suppose that's a waste too because ISA handles it whether it has a name or not. But it makes it easier on me.
Now I can look at the logs and when I see Denied and the rule is Drop This Connection, then I know what it is. Just like when I see HP Printer Broadcast protocol in the logs, I know what that is. (and how to stop it)
-----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Harrison Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 5:17 PM To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan
..where?
------------------------------------------------------- Jim Harrison MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ http://isatools.org Read the help / books / articles! -------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 13:58 To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan
I found the script available on ISAtoolz. Never heard of that site either.
Amy
-----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas W Shinder Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:54 PM To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan
I think Tsu added quite of bit of intelligence into the script :P
Thomas W Shinder, M.D. Site: www.isaserver.org Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/ Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 MVP -- ISA Firewalls
-----Original Message----- From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 3:52 PM To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan
Yep--- was there any "intelligence" in the blocking rule, or could someone do a simple port scan of the external interface from the NAT'd
internal LAN to automatically block all internal traffic? ;)
t
On 7/25/06 1:42 PM, "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all:
> Yep - total agreement and this was the core of the "fight" way back when. > Not only that, but any automated "rule builder" can be used a great DoS > mechanism. > > ------------------------------------------------------- > Jim Harrison > MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG > http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ > http://isatools.org > Read the help / books / articles! > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:52 > To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan > > .02: > > It seems like a total waste of time to respond to "scan attacks" with a block > script, as everything is being blocked anyway- just not with an explicit > "block" rule. The presence of the "scan" alert tells you that ISA is doing > its job - AFAIAC, no other action is even necessary. If there is some > incessant attack from a persistent IP hammering away at published services and > you just don't want to see it, then put in a deny rule. If it is a bandwidth > issue (like when I was getting Code Red attacks all day, every day) then block > it on the ISP side. But that costs money for that service, typically. > However, it does work. > > If it is in the realm of "identified" attacks ala my "strikeback" model, then > that is a different thing- and something that is deployed in a completely > different way to solve a different problem (lest someone tried to use that > against me ;). Port scans and "noise" traffic an safely be ignored. > > t > > > On 7/25/06 11:58 AM, "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all: > >> Think way back to your involvement with SBS in the Yahoo list. >> It was how I got invited to join that list; the BlockAttacker script >> was being touted as the be-all, end-all to ISA port scan response. >> I had to get really nasty (even for me) with the proponent of this >> technique before he finally backed down. >> He still regurgitates this nonsense (among other senseless >> meanderings) from time to time, but it's an easy head-slap. >> >> For those not familiar, the BlockAttacker script was an expansion of >> the ISA 2000 alert action example that used the client IP to create a >> packet filter blocking the "offending host". While it provided an >> excellent example of using ISA alert environment variables, it turned >> out to be a great DoS tool as well and we pulled it from isatools.org. >> >> Unfortunately, there is one (TSu) individual who shall remain nameless >> (Tony >> Su) who insists on singing the praises of this response technique to >> unsuspecting ISA admins. Luckily, he's not skilled enough to sort out >> how to port the script to ISA 2004 or we'd have more PSS calls than we do >> now. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Jim Harrison >> MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG >> http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ >> http://isatools.org >> Read the help / books / articles! >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak >> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:21 >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan >> >> I don't know that joke. I think it was before my time on the list. >> What's the block attacker script? Never heard of it. >> >> Amy Babinchak >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Jim Harrison >> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:19 PM >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Re: Port Scan >> >> Ask Tony for the BlockAttacker script. >> I'm sure he's still trying to support it. >> :-p >> >> Tom has it right; you can generally ignore them, since damn few ISPs >> even care. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> Jim Harrison >> MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG >> http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ >> http://isatools.org >> Read the help / books / articles! >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Amy Babinchak >> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:21 >> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isapros] Port Scan >> >> What should I do about a port scan that just won't go away? I've got >> two IP addresses port scanning my server around the clock. An email to >> the owner bounced back, unknown email address. >> >> Is there anything to be done? >> >> >> Amy >> >> >> >> >> All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned. >> >> >> >> >> All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned. >> >> >> >> > > > > > All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned. > > > >
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.