[isapros] Re: ISA, Exchange 2007 and Perimeter Networks

  • From: "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:30:16 -0400

That’s what I thought, now it’s what I know….

 

From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jim Harrison
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 6:35 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: ISA, Exchange 2007 and Perimeter Networks

 

Aside from normal router & switch ACLs, ISA is the single line of defense.

“..we don’t need no stinking DMZs”

 

From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Steve Moffat
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:12 PM
To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isapros] Re: ISA, Exchange 2007 and Perimeter Networks

 

Ahh…just had a thought.

 

It’s all labeling.

 

Jason, and others (not Jason’s fault), have been using the term DMZ.

 

Historically, is the term DMZ not taken literally as being completely 
firewalled off from the trusted networks, and what Jason is talking about is 
trusted network segmentation.

 

I betcha that’s why the Exchange team don’t support it…they think it’s 
a typical run of the mill DMZ…

 

Jim, isn’t MS’s Internal network segmented by usin ISA?? Including your 
mail servers?

 

S

All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. isapros
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2007