re RE: Wingate vs. ISA

  • From: "Craft, Steve" <SCraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:11:33 -0400


However, ISA still cannot port-map.  For example, the cheapest lightweight
wannabe firewall will allow traffic to come in to port 4050 on the external
interface and redirect it to port 9020 on an internal host IP number.  

That's one thing that keeps ISA from being "a real firewall" as well.  ;)


---orig

Subject: RE: Wingate vs. ISA
From: "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi noor

ISA is a real firewall, wingate isn't. There should be no difference in
speed, if you have ISA set up correctly and your dns is operating correctly.

NOTICE:  This communication, including attachments, is information that is 
confidential and may be privileged.  It constitutes non public information 
intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s).  If the reader or 
recipient of this communication is not the intended recipient, an employee or 
agent of the intended recipient who is responsible for delivering it to the 
intended recipient, or if you believe that you have received this communication 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by return email and promptly 
erase this email including attachments without reading or saving them in any 
manner.  The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of 
this email, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Receipt 
by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is not a waiver of 
confidentiality or privilege by the sender.

Other related posts: