RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW Clients

DNS queries made by or directly via the TCP/IP stack do indeed avoid the FW
client.

Application GHB* queries, on the other hand, can either be Winsock or not,
depending on how the app is written.
That's why there isn't a "this / that" answer to the question of FW client
functionality.  It's dependent on too many things; some of which you control
at the ISA server, others that are controlled by the application developers.

Witness the issues getting MSNIM voice to work; file transfers work just
fine using the FW client (given proper settings in ISA), but voice fails,
because it doesn't play nice with the FW client GHBN functionality.

Mark Strangways can verify this; we spent a weekend trying to figure out
what was happening.

Jim Harrison
MCP(NT4, 2K), A+, Network+, PCG
http://isaserver.org/authors/harrison/

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nigel Carroll" <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 05:11
Subject: [isalist] RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW
Clients


http://www.ISAserver.org


Thanks guys for all your feedback but I think Armando has got the best
answer as to why NOT to put a default GW on your FW clients - that being
that if you have a routed network then ALL non local subnet traffic will
be sent to ISA wether or not it is ultimately destined for the internet
therefore putting unnecessary burden on your ISA server.

And yes and as Jim, Brian and others have pointed out you may want to do
this as a form of security since withOUT a GW non winsock and non
tcp\udp traffic could not be sent to the internet from the FW client.

BTW Jim did you suggest that client DNS lookups do NOT use winsock calls
since they occur at a lower level?
Nigel

-----Original Message-----
From: Armando Treviño López--- [mailto:armando.trevino@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2001 3:54
Subject: RE: Why Tom recommended NOT to use a gateway for FW- Clients


Another issue is that if you configure all computers as SNAT clients,
all IP
traffic is routed by the ISA server (Not only internet, but also
intranet
traffic if you have different networks in your LAN or WAN).
So maybe this will use more server resources.

------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')




Other related posts: