RE: Stateful inspection

Bugger ! ...as they would say in England. This seriously degrades the
intelligence of
ISA compared to other solutions. Could we only do stateful on at NAT DMZ
I believe this
Would be a much more attractive firewall. I`m inclined to to take this
as an authorative
Statement, but will of course do futher reseach :-)
 
 David
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 30. oktober 2002 22:56
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: Stateful inspection
 
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hi David,
 
No.
 
That's why packet filters and trihomed DMZ (including public address
DMZs), suck. :-)
 
HTH,
Tom
 
Thomas W Shinder
www.isaserver.org/shinder <http://www.isaserver.org/shinder>  
http://tinyurl.com/1jq1 <http://tinyurl.com/1jq1> 
http://tinyurl.com/1llp <http://tinyurl.com/1llp> 
 
 
        -----Original Message-----
        From: David Elmquist [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:23 PM
        To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
        Subject: [isalist] Stateful inspection
        http://www.ISAserver.org
         Lately, I`ve been asked to make a comparison between ISA and
other firewalls, such as PIX and
        FW1. One thing that`s been nagging me, is the ability to have a
DMZ and do stateful inspection on
        Traffic there. I`m aware that ISA does in fact do stateful
inspection on traffic outbound traffic and
        Traffic initiated by published server rules. My question is
this:
         
        Does ISA perform stateful inspection on traffic to a DMZ zone
via packet filters ?
         
        The reason this is not obvious is the 3 types of traffic
configurable in a packet filter; Inbound, 
        Outbound and both. I`ve noticed that for example a filter like
TCP 3389 inbound would allow
        Terminal services to be used on the ISA machine - but a typical
oldfashined filtering firewall
        Would require a filter allowing both Inbound AND outbound
access. Stateful inspection would
        Account for this. I`ve found no literature to back this up
though...any thoughts ?
         
        Regards,
         
        David Elmquist
        ------------------------------------------------------
        List Archives:
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
        ISA Server Newsletter:
http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
        ISA Server FAQ:
http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
        ------------------------------------------------------
        Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org/
        Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
        Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
        ------------------------------------------------------
        You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion
List as: tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        To unsubscribe send a blank email to
$subst('Email.Unsub') 
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org/
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
david@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')

Other related posts: