RE: SSL Problems with ISA 2004
- From: "Ball, Dan" <DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 12:12:41 -0500
I think you hit the nail on the head, it's a matter of semantics, if
they claim it is capable of multiple ISPs, then people would expect the
whole package, load-balancing, fail-over, etc. to be included.
So, instead, they refer to it as multiple external networks, which takes
the pressure off.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 11:38
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: SSL Problems with ISA 2004
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hi Jim,
True 'nuf. In general, when they refer to multiple ISPs, they actually
mean they want multiple "default" gateways and then implement some sort
or policy based routing, or bandwidth balancing, or bandwidth
aggregation or link failover or all of the above (usually they want it
for free too) :-)
Tom
Other related posts:
