You said "As a rule of thumb; you want to populate your routes using RRAS if
its installed." But if you did that- if you used RRAS routing entries, ISA
would most certainly "depend" on the RRAS service to get that routing
information.
i.e. Local net is 192.168.1.0. Another network, 192.168.2.0 is reached via
a router- say, 192.168.1.254. If you used RRAS on ISA to create a route to
192.168.2.0 via 192.168.1.254, and the RRAS service failed, the ISA box
would no longer know how to get to 192.168.2.0. If you used "route -p add
192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.254" instead, then it would.
That's my point. Don't use RRAS entries to tell ISA about networks ISA
needs to know about.
t
----- "I'll see your Llama and up you a Badger." John T
http://www.ISAserver.org
------------------------------------------------------- Jim Harrison MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ http://isatools.org Read the help / books / articles! -------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 15:20 To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] RE: Routing Table Question
http://www.ISAserver.org
Of course- that's its purpose...
t
----- "I'll see your Llama and up you a Badger." John T
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:55 PM Subject: [isalist] RE: Routing Table Question
http://www.ISAserver.org
I misspoke..
RRAS can carry routes that do not appear in the system routing table. ISA doesn't care where the routes are; it "merges" them.
------------------------------------------------------- Jim Harrison MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ http://isatools.org Read the help / books / articles! -------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: Thor (Hammer of God) [mailto:thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 13:37 To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] RE: Routing Table Question
http://www.ISAserver.org
RRAS doesn't write to the system routes - just its "own" routes. If I create a static route with "route -p add" RRAS will see it and use it, but RRAS cannot delete it.
When it comes to ISA routes (for ISA itself, as in a complex network), I *always* use system routes and not RRAS. I assume this is one of the excpetions you note, yes?
----- "I'll see your Llama and up you a Badger." John T
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 1:29 PM Subject: [isalist] RE: Routing Table Question
http://www.ISAserver.org
Actually it reads and writes. As a rule of thumb; you want to populate your routes using RRAS if its installed. There are exceptions to this, but they're few and far between...
------------------------------------------------------- Jim Harrison MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG http://isaserver.org/Jim_Harrison/ http://isatools.org Read the help / books / articles! -------------------------------------------------------