Hi all! Due to both prize and the fact that Microsoft isn't a synonym with security for most people, I have some problems convince our sales staff to recommend ISA. - With ISA you need a server to at least $1500 + W2K ($1000) and the ISA server ($600) - integrated units like PIX and so on, is sold for $500 +. - Checkpoint is still expensive, but is close to what we need to pay for ISA. Because of this, small customers, will then like to have an integrated unit to $1000 or less, while the large customers have there doubts using Microsoft as Firewall.(they need to face there bosses and other with there choices) I know ISA has Caching, firewall, bandwith controll, content filtering and so on, but small customers don't need it, and large customers don't like to put all the eggs in one basket. Personaly, I believe in ISA - but I have serious problems convince customers and sellers that this is the one.... please help..... Thanks Bjørnar