Yeah, not a peep out of them since the first mail...... -----Original Message----- From: Ball, Dan [mailto:DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:32 PM To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] RE: Multihomed ISA Server--Please your opinion is very important http://www.ISAserver.org True, we can't make an informed recommendation without knowing the specifics... Hey, who started this thread anyways? _____ From: Troy Radtke [mailto:TRadtke@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:50 To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Subject: [isalist] RE: Multihomed ISA Server--Please your opinion is very important http://www.ISAserver.org Hi Dan, The only exception to that would be anyone sniffing traffic on the network would be able to capture packets from all of the subnets. If he's not in control of all of the servers, then there is no telling who could get a hold of someone else's information. And that's a valid concern without exact specifications on what he's trying to do. Not quite the same, but close and may be acceptable to them. ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as: tradtke@xxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx