RE: Help - SFTP port 22
- From: Alexandre Gauthier <gauthiera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:33:58 -0400
>True - my lesdixyia is clearly acting up again.
Most clearly :)
>So long as the traffic continues over TCP:22, there should be no issues.
>It's when ISA has to follow protocol changes that it can't anticipate, such
>as happens with FTPS, that you see problems.
Indeed.
>If, as the <cough> Unix geek states, it "tastes like FTP, but is less
>filling", then it's possible that there are protocol changes similar to
>FTP.
No.
Read again.
I clearly stated it used only one connection, more than once.
>If this is the case (do a net cap; this will tell you), then my earlier
>statements stand; ISA don't do this.
Well, you know nothing ressembles an encrypted packet more than another
encrypted packet. You won't see anything but SSH handshakes, key exchanges
and that's it.
I don't know why the heck I bother posting when nobody reads what I write,
make random statements or just re-tells what I have just said to look as if
they came up with it themselves. Bleh.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexandre Gauthier [mailto:gauthiera@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:33 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: Help - SFTP port 22
http://www.ISAserver.org
If you read my post again, you will notice I wrote SFTP and not FTPS. FTPS
has nothing to do with SSH whatsoever.
FTPS and SFTP are two different things, one is FTP+SSL, the other is a
custom handler running on the remote end of an SSH tunnel that can be used
from the command line in the same fashion as an FTP server.
Thank you for reading all my post. :)
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Jim Harrison [mailto:Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Envoyé : 6 octobre 2005 12:13
À : [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Objet : [isalist] RE: Help - SFTP port 22
http://www.ISAserver.org
Nope; FTPS is not SSH and SSH is not FTPS.
Just because you have an app that uses SSH and refers to it as FTPS does not
make it so.
RFCs are different; L4+ behavior is different.
Other related posts:
