MessageTom, yep sounds like the same thing, I will try it next week when I get back to work and let you know, from memory I think I block one or two sites that I am really not too worried about, was going to use http://www.contentkeeper.com/ anyway :) Jim, somehow I sent the last message twice, sorry about that. Cheers Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: Thomas W Shinder To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 4:28 PM Subject: [isalist] Re: Firewall Service dies like clockwork http://www.ISAserver.org http://www.ISAserver.org Hey guys, Here's some information I have that might be useful in this situation: Junior Member Member # 8800 posted November 15, 2002 12:13 PM ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ** NEWS FLASH ** Microsoft has managed to reproduce our problem in their lab AND they have managed to find the cause.. no cure yet though :-( IF you have UDP based publishing (any UPD not just DNS) AND a Site and Content filter containing FQDN the following happens; Incoming UDP requests are checked against the Site and Content rules by attempting to do a reverse lookup on the incoming IP (to find a FQDN to match against the IP). If this for some reason fails (like the requesting IP not being in a reverse zone) then the ISA tries to make a NBTSTAT query against the remote IP to find the FQDN. Once it has succeded, failed or timed-out on the incoming request it will then process the request. This can take some time (at least on my side we just drop incoming netbios so those will have to timeout) and during that time the ISA is gobbling up UDP connections. With heavy traffic this will at times cause the pool of available UDP mapppings to be full so that incoming requests first have to wait for another request to make it through the S&S rules before itself can start the path through! So if; - you have a remote client that is not in a reverse zone and that can not be resolved by nbtstat AND if it is re-requesting the DNS information after say 5 seconds - then you can easily end up in a situation where - the requests are being held pending, in wait for a process slot, while the ISA is trying to resolve the FQDN of a previous request FROM THE SAME MACHINE! So the good news is that they know why and the bad news is that it sounds like it is a fundamental change that needs to be done! Possible workaround, no S&S rules! Not sure I want to go that way.... Was this clear? If not, drop me a line and I'll try again.... /Jörgen HTH, Tom Thomas W Shinder www.isaserver.org/shinder http://tinyurl.com/1jq1 http://tinyurl.com/1llp