RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for SSL-tunnel (443) protocol

  • From: "Jonathon J. Howey" <Jonathon@xxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:52:09 -0700

Yah :-(   didn't think it was that big of a deal ; sorry
 
Jonathon J. Howey
KPSA Compliance Management Inc.
P 780.409.5620
F 780.409.5621
D 780.409.5628
C 780.965.8363
Jonathon@xxxxxxx
 
Guiding the Future of Transportation
www.KPSA.ca <http://www.kpsa.ca/> 
 
 
 

________________________________

From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: January 12, 2006 1:26 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for SSL-tunnel (443)
protocol


http://www.ISAserver.org

WHOA.
 
Are you saying this is ISA on SBS?
 
That's quite different and a "oh by the way, how was the play Mrs.
Lincoln" moment :)
 
Tom
 
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/> 
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/drisa/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> 
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
**Who is John Galt?**

 


________________________________

        From: Jonathon J. Howey [mailto:Jonathon@xxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:21 PM
        To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
        Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for
SSL-tunnel (443) protocol
        
        
        http://www.ISAserver.org
        
        I dunno, that's why I'm asking.  My machine uses Kerberos of
course to talk to the DC (same server as ISA; SBS 2003), and the UDP
packets go through just fine, so thats why im wondering why the TCP ones
are being denied.
         
         
        Jonathon J. Howey
        KPSA Compliance Management Inc.
        P 780.409.5620
        F 780.409.5621
        D 780.409.5628
        C 780.965.8363
        Jonathon@xxxxxxx
         
        Guiding the Future of Transportation
        www.KPSA.ca <http://www.kpsa.ca/> 
         
         
         

________________________________

        From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: January 12, 2006 1:09 PM
        To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
        Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for
SSL-tunnel (443) protocol
        
        
        http://www.ISAserver.org
        
        Why would it be allowed in the first place?
         
        Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
        Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/> 
        Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/drisa/
        Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> 
        MVP -- ISA Firewalls
        **Who is John Galt?**

         


________________________________

                From: Jonathon J. Howey [mailto:Jonathon@xxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:37 PM
                To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
                Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for
SSL-tunnel (443) protocol
                
                
                http://www.ISAserver.org
                
                For some reason, Kerberos-Sec (TCP) is being denied
between ISA Server and my internal server.  Would this have something to
do with it?
                 
                I deleted my rule I made earlier for the connection
between the external server and my internal server for port 80/443 and
the SSL-tunnel seems to be connecting.
                 
                 
                Jonathon J. Howey
                KPSA Compliance Management Inc.
                P 780.409.5620
                F 780.409.5621
                D 780.409.5628
                C 780.965.8363
                Jonathon@xxxxxxx
                 
                Guiding the Future of Transportation
                www.KPSA.ca <http://www.kpsa.ca/> 
                 
                 
                 

________________________________

                From: Jonathon J. Howey [mailto:Jonathon@xxxxxxx] 
                Sent: January 12, 2006 12:21 PM
                To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
                Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for
SSL-tunnel (443) protocol
                
                
                http://www.ISAserver.org
                
                Wouldn't the
                 
                "
                Do NOT configure the client as a Web proxy client.
                 
                UNBIND the Web proxy filter from the HTTP protocol.
                " 
                 
                 affect all traffic passing through my ISA?
                 
                 
                Jonathon J. Howey
                KPSA Compliance Management Inc.
                P 780.409.5620
                F 780.409.5621
                D 780.409.5628
                C 780.965.8363
                Jonathon@xxxxxxx
                 
                Guiding the Future of Transportation
                www.KPSA.ca <http://www.kpsa.ca/> 
                 
                 
                 

________________________________

                From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: January 12, 2006 12:19 PM
                To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
                Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection Attempt" for
SSL-tunnel (443) protocol
                
                
                http://www.ISAserver.org
                
                Hi Jonathon,
                 
                OK, if we're going to play a guessing game, I would do
this:
                 
                Create an SSL Server Publishing Rule
                 
                Create an Acess Rule allowing outbound SSL connections.
                 
                Do NOT configure the client as a Web proxy client.
                 
                UNBIND the Web proxy filter from the HTTP protocol.
                 
                HTH,
                Tom
                 
                Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
                Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/> 
                Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/drisa/
                Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
<http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> 
                MVP -- ISA Firewalls
                **Who is John Galt?**

                 


________________________________

                        From: Jonathon J. Howey
[mailto:Jonathon@xxxxxxx] 
                        Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:10 PM
                        To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
                        Subject: [isalist] RE: "Failed Connection
Attempt" for SSL-tunnel (443) protocol
                        
                        
                        http://www.ISAserver.org
                        
                        Tom, I'm wondering if I created a Perimeter
network consisting of my internal server and the server I'm trying to
access over 443, if it will work?
                         
                         
                        Jonathon J. Howey
                        KPSA Compliance Management Inc.
                        P 780.409.5620
                        F 780.409.5621
                        D 780.409.5628
                        C 780.965.8363
                        Jonathon@xxxxxxx
                         
                        Guiding the Future of Transportation
                        www.KPSA.ca <http://www.kpsa.ca/> 
                         
                         
                         

                        to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
Jonathon@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

Other related posts: