RE: Botched Setup based on W3k server / ISA 2004
- From: "John T \(Lists\)" <johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'[ISAserver.org Discussion List]'" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:00:08 -0800
While an option we would not like to use, I would also recommend this as it
sounds like the best course is to rebuild the server from scratch as you do
not know what other "problems" may be lurking on the server.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Highton Jr [mailto:russh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:02 AM
> To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
> Subject: [isalist] RE: Botched Setup based on W3k server / ISA 2004
>
> http://www.ISAserver.org
>
> I would get another older firewall of some kind (In a lot of cases a
> linksys router will work) and put it in place while you rebuild that ISA
> disaster from scratch. It's the only way to ensure complete
> reliability. With only 5 servers it would work.
>
> - Russ
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
> ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
> ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
> http://www.techgenix.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
> You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
> johnlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
> Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
