[interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- From: "DarkWyrm" <bpmagic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:15:44 -0500 EST
> Hi!
>
> I had started to do a patch BApplication, moving the connection to
> the app_server to the "connect_to_app_server()" method, adding
_init_interface_kit(), setup_server_heaps(), etc.
> But I noticed that we are sending to the app server also the app's
> signature. Is that really needed? I tought that the object token would
be sufficient.
> Can someone explain, please ?
IIRC, in the early stages of the app_server and the prototypes, the app
signature was the main way to determine whether or not the application
was still running. Every three seconds or so, the app_server does a
quick check to make sure that all applications it has in its list are
still valid, and it would check via thread name. It wasn't quite good
enough, so it checks for the app's port. It's been kept around for
server debugging purposes, though. It probably should be kept around
because it makes debugger server-side applcation stuff *much* easier.
--DW
- References:
- [interfacekit] some questions on BApplication
- From: burton666@xxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] some questions on BApplication
- » [interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- » [interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- » [interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- » [interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- » [interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- » [interfacekit] Re: some questions on BApplication
- [interfacekit] some questions on BApplication
- From: burton666@xxxxxxxxx