[interfacekit] Re: locking...
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: interfacekit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:38:55 +0200 CEST
"Adi Oanca" <e2joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In Be's implementation, it is clear that a lock is required.
> In my method, is it required?
It's not required when you read the bounds, but if you can change the
bounds of the view, it is - of course only, if you can't atomicly set
the BRect to the new value; to my knowledge, you can't do that using
the Be provided atomic API or on x86 at all.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [interfacekit] locking...
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [interfacekit] locking...
- » [interfacekit] Re: locking...
- » [interfacekit] Re: locking...
- [interfacekit] locking...
- From: Adi Oanca